Unfortunately, many decisions were made last week with the idea that there would be a lot of rain this week. Not so much. This has resulted in missing activation of residual herbicides and difficulty getting water started to flood fields that have been fertilized.
Those rains were supposed to help with all of that. Naturally after all the damage the rain has caused for so long, once it has an opportunity to help it doesn’t show up. The wheel in the sky keeps on turning.
Comment of the week: “If things were a little bit different, things would be a lot different.” A little rain. A little heat. A little less wind. Any one of those happens and it’s a different world out there.
Things are heating up now for a few days then it’s back to a week full of upper 80s and partly cloudy. I don’t know what to believe except to start farming like it’s not going to rain again. I would rather be ready and have to shut down than not be ready. Everybody wash your trucks and we’ll get a nice shower.
More on Urea and Ammonium Sulfate Blends Applied Preflood
These comments are in response to questions about 41-0-0-4 sulfur-coated urea in last week’s update. It seems many are actually using a blend of urea (5/6) and ammonium sulfate (1/6) to achieve a 41-0-0-4 fertilizer analysis. This is more in line with a preferred option of blending AMS with urea (mentioned in previous update).
Rice News on AgFax
However, some claim reduced salt issues despite AMS having the same or greater salt content than urea. Particularly on high pH soils there may be some differences in immediate soil reaction between the two, but the use of NBPTtreated urea should limit the difference in reaction between urea and AMS.
So, use AMS in with your preflood N in some fashion if you think you need the sulfur or just want the more immediate kick. Remember that most of our rice soils do not respond to sulfur so any plant response you get is from the ammonium. However, there has been no research that suggests it is worth paying for ammonium sulfate in place of urea at the preflood timing. Save the money and go with urea in most instances.
If in a system that’s working for you, consider changes carefully. But look for those opportunities to save a little expense.
Midseason Nitrogen Applications for Pureline Cultivars
Nitrogen (N) management in rice is an important component that can’t be taken lightly, but can also be just as damaging as it is beneficial when the proper steps aren’t taken.
The majority of rice has been flooded and we are starting the march toward green ring (PI; panicle initiation) and ½-inch internode elongation (PD; panicle differentiation) and considerations for midseason N applications should be at the forefront of your rice management plan.
Midseason N applications are ONLY recommended for pureline cultivars. If possible, the GreenSeeker reference plot and handheld device should be used to determine the need for additional N.
A few things to consider in regards to midseason N applications:
- Preflood N, when managed correctly and applied at the proper rate, can be sufficient to produce maximal yields in our modern semi-dwarf and stiff-strawed cultivars.
- Midseason N only influences one of the three yield components of rice – kernel weight. Tiller number and panicle size are related to preflood N management; therefore, midseason N applications to pureline cultivars influence kernel weight and kernel filling on secondary and tertiary tillers.
- Applications of midseason N should be made a minimum of three weeks post-flood AND after ½-inch internode elongation has occurred. Recent work has suggested that 4-5 weeks post-flood is the optimal time to apply midseason N applications to pureline rice cultivars. We want to give the rice plant ample time to take up all of the preflood N prior to applying the midseason N. When these two applications overlap (i.e. the plant is still taking up preflood N when the midseason is applied) the ability of the rice plant to use the midseason is greatly diminished.
- When applying midseason N to flooded rice fields use 45 units of N per acre as untreated urea. There is no need for urea treated with NBPT to be applied into the floodwater at the midseason N timing.
- Midseason N is taken up very efficiently with the majority being recovered in the rice plant within 4-7 days following application.
If you were not able to get a GreenSeeker reference plot established in your rice then it is best to follow your N management plan and include the midseason N application. That is unless you implemented an optimum preflood N rate that was flooded in a timely manner and maintained for at least 3 weeks.
Most often, midseason N applications will not have a net negative effect on rice yield and performance unless the preflood N rate was excessive. In the future, consider establishing a GreenSeeker reference plot with your preflood N application to help take the guesswork out of midseason N management.
Most county agents and some consultants have access to a handheld GreenSeeker unit that can be used to determine if there will be a benefit (significant increase in rice yield) from the application of midseason nitrogen.