Nebraska: Field Pea Production – Rotational Costs and Benefits
Editor’s Note: For charts and tables see source link at bottom.
Grain-type field peas are a cool season grain crop (mid-March to late-July) typically grown as an alternative for no-till summer fallow in semiarid cereal-based cropping systems, such as wheat-corn-fallow or wheat-fallow.
A two-year rotation study was conducted on a cooperator’s field in Chase County near Enders to compare the impact of field peas versus no-till summer fallow on the following parameters:
- Soil: nutrient cycling, microbial activity, and water infiltration
- Beneficial insects and microorganisms
- Water use (i.e., evapotranspiration)
- Yield of succeeding winter wheat crop
Soil Nutrient Cycling, Microbial Activity, and Water Infiltration
Here are four key takeaways from our preliminary results on soil data:
- Concentrations of soil nutrients (N, P, and K) did not differ between areas growing field peas and fallow at any time during the two-year rotation study.
- Solvita tests (soil microbial activity expressed as CO2-C release) conducted after wheat planting in the fall and in the spring had higher soil-microbial activity and annual nitrogen (N) release in areas of the field where field peas were grown. After wheat harvest, Solvita results did not differ between field peas and fallow treatment.
- Rotational benefit from N fixed by field peas may already be scavenged by wheat or is likely to be seen in the next rotational crop (corn/sorghum); this is currently being investigated.
- The initial soil water infiltration was collected after wheat harvest by taking four subsamples in six replications. Time needed to infiltrate 0.4 inches (10 cm) of water until 50% of soil was exposed was 174 seconds for fallow treatment and 87 seconds for the field pea treatment, suggesting 50% faster soil infiltration rate with field peas in the rotation.
Beneficial Microorganisms and Insects
Beneficial microbial analysis showed that more diverse species were recovered in the wheat plants following field peas as compared to following fallow. Extraction of mycorrhiza spores showed an average count of 16.5 propagules in pea rhizosphere compared to average count of eight propagules from the fallow plots.
There was no significant difference in terms of foliar disease levels between wheat samples following peas compared to wheat samples following fallow, although non-pathogenic Fusarium species were recovered from the root of samples from both treatments.
Planting field peas positively affected the diversity of microorganisms that could be beneficial for the subsequent wheat crop. The beneficial bacteria recovered from the wheat has the potential to stop or reduce the impact of field pea disease/pathogens.
In 2015, field peas supported greater numbers and diversity of insects than fallow. In particular, there were a greater number of beneficial predators (wolf spiders, rove beetles, hoverflies), parasitoid wasps, and decomposers (dung beetles and carrion beetles), but also a greater number of potential pests (click beetles and leafhoppers). In 2016, aphids were lower and some natural enemies (crab spiders and parasitoid wasps) were higher in wheat following field peas.
Water Use and Crop Yield
Water use data indicated that field peas used 10.9 inches of water in 2015 to produce 36 bu/ac yield, which resulted in crop water productivity of 3.3 bushel per acre-inch. Fallow used 6.0 inches of water without producing any grain. Available soil water at wheat planting (top 4 ft) was 3.2 inches less after field peas as compared to fallow treatment, which resulted in a 18 bu/ac yield peanalty in wheat at the end of the season.
Field peas have potential to be used as an alternative to no-till summer fallow in wheat-fallow and wheat-corn-fallow rotations to increase sustainability of crop production systems in western Nebraska. Preliminary results of our rotation study show that replacing fallow with field peas can
- increase soil microbial activity and soil water infiltration,
- provide habitat for a greater number of beneficial microorganisms and insects,
- provide more efficient cropping system water use, and
- be more profitable than no-till summer fallow.
Weather conditions throughout the first year of the experiment favored growth and production of field peas. Therefore, more research is needed to evaluate rotational effects of field peas during dry years.
Source: : http://cropwatch.unl.edu/2017/field-pea-production-rotational-costs-and-benefits
I recently attended a Farm Credit Director Development program in Charleston, South Carolina, where Dave Kohl presented an agricultural economic update. I thought his presentation was exceptional. He described agricultural