Agfax Buzz:
    July 11, 2014
    irrigation-pivot-small-cotton-06122014-featured

    Georgia Cotton: Irrigation Timing – Best Tool?

    AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source

    By Clint Thompson, University of Georgia

    With rain being sparse in some areas of Georgia this summer, irrigation is a necessary expense all farmers have to consider. Whether it’s with the checkbook method, soil moisture sensors or software programs, cotton farmers have a plethora of options to choose from, says a University of Georgia Extension expert.

    Guy Collins, UGA Extension’s cotton agromomist, says during the three-week squaring period cotton crops need one inch of water per week depending on soil type and environmental conditions. The crop also needs this much water for the first week of bloom.

    A cotton crop’s water needs increase to one and a half inch during second week of bloom and top off at two inches for the third and fourth bloom weeks. For the fifth and sixth weeks of bloom, the crop’s water needs drop back to one and a half inches. That total drops further to one inch each week for the rest of the season until bolls begin to open in which irrigation ceases.




    For example, if a farmer’s cotton receives eight tenths of an inch of rain during the first part of the week of squaring, the crop only needs two tenths of an inch of irrigation later that week to reach the one-inch of water the crop needs for the week.

    Keeping up with the amount of water a cotton crop needs can be a confusing task and farmers also have to decide which irrigation method works best for their needs. “There’s not one method that’s superior to others. It just depends on the grower’s needs and what they can do,” Collins said.

    The checkbook method is an approach that’s suitable for growers that aren’t using sensors or any other way to calculate irrigation. It follows the growth curve of the plant. As cotton bolls develop and mature, the plant’s water requirements change. It’s important to consider how the amount of water needed by the plant changes throughout the season, regardless of the irrigation strategy used, Collins said.

    Unlike the checkbook method, sensor-based irrigation systems can more accurately account for other variables when determining the appropriate time to irrigate. Sensors measure the soil moisture and accurately determine how much moisture the cotton plants are receiving from the soil at a given point in time.

    According to Collins, a sensor can help the farmer account for differences in soil texture and rainfall and determine when to turn irrigation on and off. Without a sensor, the farmer’s just guessing, he said.

    Soil moisture sensors also help growers save money. Normally a 5-10 day dry period would be detrimental to a cotton crop. But that wasn’t the case during last year’s extremely wet summer.

    Without sensors, a farmer may have applied irrigation unnecessarily. Collins said sensors in the soil would have reported how much moisture still remained. Unlike other years, last year’s cotton crop would not have been harmed by going without water for 10 days because of frequent rains and surplus soil moisture.

    The 2014 season may be very different, as Georgia suffers through prolonged hot and dry spell in many areas.

    The downside to sensor-based irrigation, though, is the added expense and time they require. Collins said.

    An irrigation practice becoming more and more popular is subsurface drip irrigation — a way to water cotton beneath the soil. Collins said subsurface drip irrigation is ideal for smaller, odd-shaped fields not suitable for pivot irrigation.

    If a well is located nearby, subsurface drip irrigation may be an option. “All of a sudden, a field that would otherwise be a dry land field can now be irrigated, just through a different system,” Collins said.

    The benefit of this system is that it more accurately adjusts for rainfall. Because a farmer only irrigates a small portion at a time, the potential for water loss could be much less if it rains after an irrigation.

    “For example, in the pivot system, a farmer may apply an inch of water over a one or two-day period. But if a thunderstorm pops up later in the week and brings five-tenths of an inch of rain, there’s an excess of five-tenths of an inch of water. And, there’s five-tenths of an inch of irrigation that could have been saved,” Collins said.

    With the subsurface drip system, a farmer applies a couple of tenths of an inch of water per day. Since so little water is being distributed at one time, the farmer is less likely to lose valuable water if it rains later in the week.

    On the downside, drip systems require much higher maintenance than the pivot system, Collins said. This is why only a small percentage of farmers use the method, he said.

    In his UGA Extension work across the state, Collins meets growers that only irrigate when their cotton is wilting. He strongly advises against this.

    “Chances are, however, the farmer has already lost yields if the cotton is left without water for too long,” he said.


    Tags: , , , , ,

    Leave a Reply

    Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

    Agfax Cotton News

    Alabama: Website Created to Help Navigate Farm Bill9-2

    DTN Cotton Open: Tumbles to Five-Session Low9-2

    South Carolina: Crop Production Field Day Set Sept. 25 at Blackville9-2

    Keith Good: Rail Service Problems Persist; Hog Prices Rebounding9-2

    Texas Cotton Industry Mourns The Death Of Economist Carl Anderson9-1

    China Cotton: Reserves’ Quantity, Quality Cause Problems – DTN9-1

    Keith Good: Production Costs Out of Balance with Expected Revenues9-1

    Flint on Crops: Rain Is Better Than Well Water9-1

    California Cotton: Defoliation Just Around The Corner – AgFax8-31

    California Cotton: Managing Late Pests, Preventing Sticky Problems8-31

    Texas Cotton: Managing Late Fields – Hale And Swisher Counties8-30

    California Cotton: Late-Season Symptoms – Should You Worry?8-30

    Rose on Cotton: Plenty of Gaps and No Rallies Expected8-29

    California Cotton: West Side Field Day Set For September 118-29

    Cleveland on Cotton: Chinese Demand Pulling Prices Higher8-29

    Doane Cotton Close: Futures Unable to Recover Losses8-29

    Mississippi Cotton: When to Terminate Bollworm Sprays in Late Bt Fields8-29

    DTN Cotton Close: Late Rally Leaves Dec. Flat8-29

    AFB Cotton Close: Dec. Moves Fractionally Lower8-29

    Farm Bill: Cotton Transition Assistance Enrollment Now Open8-29

    Mississippi Cotton: Healthy Crop Tempered by Slumping Prices8-29

    DTN Cotton Open: Extends Prior-Session Loss8-29

    Farm Payments to Stakeholders Rise as Gov. Payments Decline – USDA8-29

    Young Farmer in Your Future? – Helping Him or Her is Key to Success. – DTN8-29

    Tennessee Cotton: Cool Temperatures Set Crop Back8-29

    Net Farm Income Forecast to Fall,10.6% Decline Crop Value – USDA8-29

    Keith Good: Corn, Soybean Farmers May Face Financial Pinch in 20158-29

    AFB Cotton Close: Market Turns Lower8-28

    Doane Cotton Close: News from China Moves Market Lower8-28

    Missouri: Moth Trap Data for Bootheel Pests8-28

    Alabama: Pesticide Clean Days, Sept. 3-48-28

    Oklahoma: Peanut and Cotton Field Tour, Fort Cobb, Sept. 238-28

    Oklahoma: Fall Cotton Tour, Hydro, Sept. 118-28

    North Carolina Cotton: Bollworms Developing in Bt Fields8-28

    Farm Drones Under Scrutiny: Farmers Impatient for FAA Ruling – DTN8-28

    DTN Cotton Close: Settles at 3 Session Low8-28

    Georgia Cotton: Boll-Feeding Insects on the Prowl8-28

    John Deere Lays Off 460 from Waterloo, Iowa Factory8-28