Thursday, June 19, 2014
bins-and-beans-feature

Kansas: Maximize Profits Through Better Management

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop producers have experienced record-high prices for their commodities the past few years–so how are some of these producers still losing money? Although weather, and specifically drought conditions, can play a role in crop and profit loss, management also plays a major role in profitability.

An economic analysis conducted by Kansas State University agricultural economists sought to identify factors that make the difference in profits for Kansas’ major crop enterprises. The analysis compared high-profit, mid-profit and low-profit operations using Kansas Farm Management Association crop enterprise data from the past three years, 2011-2013.

Kevin Dhuyvetter, agricultural economist and former K-State faculty member, along with Lacey Ward, K-State agricultural economics graduate student, conducted the analysis. Dhuyvetter said it is an update of studies previously done that examined the same main crop enterprises in Kansas–dryland corn, irrigated corn, sorghum, wheat, soybeans, double-crop soybeans and alfalfa. They had varying numbers of farms, depending on the enterprise.

Three years of data helped smooth through circumstances that might happen in any one year, he said. The analysis required that the farms in each enterprise be included in the data report all three years. The three-year average returns for all farms were sorted and split into thirds. The analysis showed a tremendous difference in the profit, or the returns to management, between the top third and bottom third.

“For example, think of the non-irrigated crops like wheat, corn, milo and soybeans,” Dhuyvetter said. “We’re talking $116 up to $150, $160 per acre difference between the top third and bottom third. There are some soybean farmers out there making $150, $160 more per acre than other soybean farmers. That’s a huge difference when you think of dryland farming, where the average rent across the state tends to be $60-$70 (per acre).”

The difference between the average profit for high-profit and low-profit farms ranged from $113 for double-crop soybeans to $335 for irrigated corn, the researchers found.

Focus on management and yield improvement

Why such large gaps between high-profit and low-profit farms? The 2011-2013 analysis showed a bit different results compared to years past, Ward said. In the past, often times costs was the big driver in the differences between the top third and bottom third.

“This time, the thing that’s different as opposed to some earlier studies is most of the differences between the top and bottom thirds are due to income, not costs,” she said. “Costs obviously are still important, and some crops more important than others, but income is the big driver.”

A lot of people think that those who get the high prices make the money, Dhuyvetter said, but price isn’t the dominant income driver. Yield is the dominant driver as to why some producers make more money than others.

“Now, if you happen to get high yields because you caught a rain and other people didn’t, there’s not a lot you can do about that, but these are three-year averages,” he said. “For most of the crops, we didn’t see any strong regional tendencies. So, I think the yield still relates to management. Some people are just doing a better job of getting higher yields.”

Costs still important

The analysis showed the top third, or the most profitable group, not only generated the highest income, almost always due to highest yield, but those producers also kept their costs in check, Ward said. This indicates that producers can achieve good yields without having excessively high costs.

“You don’t have to spend a ton of money to get the highest yields,” she said.

“We have people out there getting better yields than their neighbors and not spending any more money per acre,” Dhuyvetter added.

The one cost that consistently was the big difference between the high third and low third was machinery, Dhuyvetter said, which has been the case in past analyses.

“While we didn’t specifically look at a size effect, the one thing that’s pretty consistent is the farms in the top third, profit-wise, tend to be bigger, and that’s why I think they have lower machinery costs,” he said. “They’re just doing a better job at spreading fixed costs over more acres. It’s economies of scale.”

The crop enterprise that was most surprising in the 2011-2013 analysis was alfalfa, Dhuyvetter said. The high third had the highest yield and the lowest machinery costs.

“If there’s one crop you think high yields will be associated with high machinery costs, with baling and hauling hay, it’s alfalfa,” he said. “The most successful people still had lower machinery costs.”

Inputs such as seed and fertilizer may or may not be lower for the top third, the researchers found, which means those costs were not directly related to yield.

“The other thing we know about this time period, we had some tough areas of the state, areas that didn’t get a lot of rain for the years analyzed,” Dhuyvetter said. “One thing we saw was crop insurance indemnity payments for some crops, specifically non-irrigated corn, were much higher than we’ve ever seen in the past. However, that wasn’t a big driver in explaining profitability differences, because typically all farms, low-profit, mid-profit and high-profit, tended to have crop insurance.”

Recognize where you stand

Dhuyvetter said it’s important for producers to recognize where they fall in line from a profitability standpoint and particularly if they’re in the bottom third, identify ways to apply better management strategies and cut costs. Producers can obtain the data and access the 2011-2013 analysis paper at K-State’s AgManager website (here).

“On the cow-calf, it’s almost all cost related,” he said, “not price or weight of calves.”

Tags: , , , , ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Grain TV: Corn Hit by Double-Whammy3-31

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Corn Takes Bearish Hit3-31

    AFB Cotton Close: USDA Boosts Prices3-31

    AFB Rice Close: USDA Numbers Bearish3-31

    DTN Livestock Close: Lean Hog Futures See Follow-Through Buying3-31

    Planting Intentions Not a Surprise, Grain Stocks Another Matter – DTN3-31

    Wheat: Know When to Apply Right Herbicide at the Right Time3-31

    DTN Cotton Close: Rebounds Following Post-Report Dip3-31

    Welch on Wheat: Reports Mostly in Line with Expectations3-31

    Welch on Grain: Bearish Reports for Corn3-31

    DTN Grain Close: Reports Support Soybeans, Disappoint Corn, Wheat3-31

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices3-31

    Good on Grain: USDA Has Friendly Surprise for Soybeans; Negative News for Corn3-31

    Shurley on Cotton: Acreage Intentions Meet High End of Expectations3-31

    Rice Stocks: Rough Rice Up 26%3-31

    Grain Stocks: Corn, Wheat, Soybeans All Increase3-31

    Indiana: Too Cold to Plant; Nebraska: Tillage, Weed Spray Started – DTN3-31

    USDA Conservation Service Has $332M to Give Away – Applications Due May 153-31

    USDA Perspective Plantings: Soybeans Gain. Otherwise, Slippage.3-31

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Concerns About Dry Weather, Acid Shortage3-31

    DTN Livestock Midday: Lack of Buyer Interest3-31

    DTN Grain Midday: Weather Concerns in Southern Plains3-31

    Soybeans: Climate Change Cost Farmers $11B Over Last 20 Years3-31

    Pecans: 11 Land-Grant Institutions Help Protect Yields3-31

    DTN Cotton Open: Lower Trades Ahead of USDA Report3-31

    Tung Trees: Beautiful, Toxic, and Need to be Taken Out3-31

    DTN Livestock Open: Follow-Through Buying Support3-31

    DTN Grain Open: U.S. Dollar Extends Recent Gains3-31

    Grain TV: Corn Exports Remain Strong3-30

    Almonds and Pistachios: Chinese Tastes for U.S. Nuts Fuel Demand3-30

    Video: 6 Need-To-Know Things About Tree Crops3-30

    Louisiana Rice: 2 New Clearfield Lines Show Some Promise3-30

    Corn, Soybeans: Expected Returns and Acre Shifts – farmdoc3-30

    Ag in Harvard? Spring Break Trip Explores Rural Life – DTN3-30

    DTN Fertilizer Outlook: Spot Shortages to Drive Domestic Prices3-30

    Corn: 3 Tips to Better Manage Cutworms3-30

    Flint on Crops: Best Time to Apply Lime? Whenever It’s Needed3-30

    Texas Rice: Section 18 Requires More Work Than You Might Think – Mo Way3-27

    Farmland Partners Buys 15,000 Row Crop Acres In Carolinas, Virginia3-27

    Rice Market: Export Pace Continues Strong, Still Not Much Planting3-27

    Rose on Cotton: Don’t Miss an Opportunity. Get Short Terms in Place.3-27

    Video: 8 Need-to-know Things About Southern Grain3-27

    Cover Crops: What’s the Cost? Online Tool Helps Figure it Out.3-27

    ARC-PLC Deadline Extension: 77% of Farmers Have Made a Decision – DTN3-27

    Soybeans: What Inputs Can You Cut Back? 5 Main Choices. – DTN3-27

    Cleveland On Cotton: “December has 70-cents-plus written all over it.”3-27

    Texas: Feral Hog, Predator Management Workshop, Rocksprings, April 243-27

    Weekly Cotton Market Review – USDA3-27

    Video: 13 Best Practices to Manage Tarnished Plant Bugs3-27

    Peanut Stocks: Utilization Up 7% Over Last Year3-27

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights3-27

    Soybeans: How Has Chinese Demand Impacted the Market? – farmdoc3-27

    Oklahoma City Farm Show, April 3-53-27

    Texas: Hale and Swisher Crops Conference, Plainview, April 143-27

    Louisiana: Soybean Board Awards LSU $1.9M for Soy Research3-27

    Base Acres and ARC-PLC Deadline Extended to April 7 – No Surprise Here.3-27

    Mississippi: Students Learn Soil Management, Conservation by Getting Down in the Dirt3-27

    Estate Planning: Farmers Gift the Farm to Their Rural Community – DTN3-27

    Corn Maybe Has More Bullish Potential Than Beans Ahead Of USDA Projections3-27

    Georgia: Wheat Leaf Rust Detected, May Want to Check the Field3-27

    Death Tax: South Dakota Congressman Pushes Repeal, Tells Her Story – Video3-26

    Environmental Group Questions USDA’s Science Integrity – DTN3-26

    Making Money With Manure, Advantages of Composting and Additives – DTN3-26

    Chumrau on Wheat: Where More Rain is Needed to Make the HRW Crop3-26

    Texas Wheat: Concho, McCulloch Counties Wheat Tour, Millersview, April 303-26

    Sorghum: Why It’s South China’s Hottest Import Grain – DTN3-26

    ELS Cotton Competitive Payment Rate Is Zero3-26

    Moving Grain: Ohio River Barge Traffic Improves3-26

    Video: Summary of U.S. Drought Monitor in One Minute3-26

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney +