Thursday, June 19, 2014
benfranklin_100

Crop Insurance Overlap with PLC

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Overview

This article addresses the potential for overlap that can exist between crop insurance and the Price Loss Coverage (PLC) program option in the 2014 farm bill.  To provide perspective, the historical overlap that existed between target prices and crop insurance prices from 1974 through 2006 is examined.  The article ends with summary observations including implications for policy and the upcoming farm program decision by farmers.

Policy Background

Target prices began with the 1973 farm bill.  They have existed ever since except for the 1996-2001 crop years when the 1996 farm bill replaced target price payments with direct payments.  PLC is the latest version of target price programs.  It refers to target prices as reference prices.  All target price programs have made payments when the market price is below the target price, although different farm bills have used different measures of market price.

Price Decline Overlap

PLC and crop insurance can make payments for the same price decline if

(1)     price declines between the insurance pre-plant and harvest price discovery periods, and

(2)     the price decline continues throughout the ensuing crop marketing year resulting in a crop year average price that is less than the PLC reference price.

Analysis

The potential for this overlap is examined using target prices for the 1974-1995 and 2002-0606 crop years for the economically and politically important crops of corn, rice, sorghum, soybeans, upland cotton, and wheat.  This period was selected in part because market prices exhibited no sustained upward or downward trend.  Trends affect the probability of payment by target price programs.

The target prices are from Agricultural Statistics, an annual U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) publication.  Crop year average prices are from the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Quick Stats database.  Consistent with PLC, per unit deficiency payment is calculated as the Target Price minus the U.S. crop year average price.

Insurance prices for 2000 and forward are from the Risk Management Agency (RMA) website.  For earlier years, a data set created by Art Barnaby of Kansas State University is used.  RMA did not compute harvest insurance prices prior to the introduction of revenue insurance, which began with Crop Revenue Coverage (CRC) in 1996.  However, Art estimated harvest prices for prior years using RMA methods.  Note that crop insurance was not offered for rice until the 1987 crop year and the insurance price used for wheat is the price based on the Chicago futures market.

Findings

The insurance price declined between the pre-plant and harvest price discovery periods in about 50% of all years as well as during only those years in which a deficiency payment occurred (Figure 1).  Such a finding was expected because insurance prices for the examined crops are based on futures prices.  It is widely-accepted that futures prices are unbiased price estimates and that new bullish and bearish price information is generated randomly.  Hence price increases and decreases about 50% of the time.

figur1.jpg

Click Image to Enlarge

During the years a deficiency payment was made and insurance price declined, average per unit deficiency payment expressed as a percent of the pre-plant insurance price exceeded average decline in insurance price for all crops (Figure 2).  The smallest difference is for corn:  a -15% decline in insurance price vs. a per unit deficiency payment that averaged 18% of the insurance pre-plant price.

The largest difference is for rice: a -18% decline in insurance price vs. a deficiency payment that averaged 59% of the insurance pre-plant price.  It should be noted that the average decline in insurance price is similar among crops, ranging from -13% for wheat to -18% for rice.  Again, this finding was expected for reasons discussed in the previous paragraph.

figur2.jpg

Click Image to Enlarge

Summary Observations

  • An overlap can exist between target price deficiency payments and declines in crop insurance price between the pre-plant and harvest price discovery periods.
  • The exact degree of overlap expected between PLC and crop insurance is difficult to calculate because PLC pays on 85 percent of FSA farms’ base acres while insurance pays on 100% of acres planted on the insured unit.  Nevertheless, this overlap has the potential to be large as illustrated by the historical experiences during the 1974-1995 and 2002-2006 crop years.
  • A policy issue is whether the deficiency payments that coincide with the insurance deductible is an overlap.  Farmers will not likely view this part of PLC payments as an overlap.  However, the social contract which underpins public subsidies for farm insurance is that a partnership exists between society and farmers in managing farm production and revenue risk.  The farmer’s share of this partnership involves the insurance deductible and payment of a premium.  PLC payments alter the deductible component of the social contract.
  • Given that crop revenue insurance is a key, if not the key, component of the crop safety net, an obvious policy question is whether the overlap between PLC reference prices and crop revenue insurance prices should be considered when designing the crop safety net?  More specifically, should the overlap be eliminated by integrating the prices of the two programs?
  • A related, interesting historical policy question is whether the elimination of target prices between 1996 and 2001 by the 1996 farm bill allowed revenue insurance products to gain traction, thereby altering the future path of farm policy debates?
  • Farmers should consider the insurance – PLC overlap when making their farm program choice.  Overlapping payments would provide additional government assistance if prices decline and stay below the PLC reference prices.  Electing PLC also creates the potential for substituting PLC for crop revenue insurance in terms of providing assistance against price declines.  This substitution allows farmers to replace revenue insurance with cheaper yield insurance.
  • Because the new insurance Supplemental Coverage Option is only available if PLC is elected, insurance companies and agents have an economic self-interest in promoting PLC as the farm program choice.  However, the potential to replace higher premium revenue insurance with lower premium yield insurance when deficiency payments are expected blunts this economic self-interest.  It will be interesting to see how these competing impacts play out.

Carl Zulauf

farmdocDaily

Tags: , , , , ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Grain TV: China Lowers Soybean Reserve Requirement4-20

    DTN Livestock Close: Future Crash Hard Out of the Gate4-20

    Georgia: UGA Seeks Public Help Tracking Brown Marmorated Stink Bug4-20

    6 Need-To-Know Things About Tree Crops This Week – AgFax Video4-20

    Welch on Wheat: Crop Conditions Unchanged4-20

    Crop Progress: Spring Wheat Planting Jumps, Other Crops Still Slow – DTN4-20

    Welch on Grain: Corn Planting Just Behind Average4-20

    Corn: Website Helps Identify, Respond to Ear Rots4-20

    DTN Cotton Close: Moderate to Heavy Rains in Southeast4-20

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Improved Weather Weighs on Corn4-20

    California Cotton: Damaged Roots Prompt Some Mite Treatments – Podcast4-20

    AFB Cotton Close: Slowing Global Market4-20

    AFB Rice Close: Stocks Continue to Weigh on Prices4-20

    DTN Grain Close: Commercial Buying in Soybeans, Wheat4-20

    Wheat: Kansas Researchers Produce Break Through Genetic Study4-20

    GMO Crops: Plant Gene May Stop Contamination of Conventional Crops4-20

    Good on Grain: Will Soybean Consumption Reach the USDA Projection?4-20

    Beef is Far From a Loser at Dinner Time, But It’s Not Exactly the Big Winner – DTN4-20

    DTN Livestock Midday: Long Liquidation and Technical Selling4-20

    DTN Grain Midday: Improvement in Chinese Values4-20

    Texas Wheat: Multi-County Field Tour, Taylor County, May 14-20

    Upland Cotton Genome Unlocked, 1st Step Towards Better Varieties4-20

    Grain Sorghum: Cruiser 5FS Seed Treatment Approved for Sugarcane Aphids4-20

    DTN Cotton Open: China Stimulates Slowing Economy4-20

    Flint on Crops: 4 Priorities for a High Level of Crop Success4-20

    DTN Grain Open: Little Influence from U.S. Dollar Index4-20

    DTN Livestock Open: New Offerings Suspected to be Larger4-20

    Way on Rice: Sugarcane Aphid – Scout Your Sorghum Crop4-18

    Rice Crop: Planting Moves Ahead Despite Rain Delays in Some Areas4-18

    Rice Market: Futures Dipped, But Didn’t Fall Out of Bed4-18

    Tweet of the Week: No Fertilizer – Warning to Landlords4-17

    Cleveland on Cotton: Trading Range Stretching Topside; MidSouth Water Logged4-17

    Rose on Cotton: Spring Rally Coming. Are You Ready?4-17

    Grain TV: Rains Expected to Relieve Wheat Belt Concerns4-17

    Old World Bollworm Arrival Eminent: USDA Invests $1.2M in Detection, Control – DTN4-17

    Rice Planting Stalls Out During A Really Wet Week – AgFax4-17

    How Will China’s Investments in Agriculture Affect U.S. Producers?4-17

    Southern Corn – More Rain Delays And Chance For Smaller Plantings – AgFax4-17

    Conservation Compliance: 5 Steps Needed Before June 1 Deadline4-17

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights4-17

    Georgia Cotton: No Counter 20G Approval for 20154-17

    Wheat, Feed Grains, and Oilseeds: 2015 Loan Rates Announced – USDA4-17

    Weekly Cotton Market Review – USDA4-17

    Bird Flu Causes Export Bans, Corn and Beef Could Take a Hit – DTN4-17

    Dried Distillers Grain: Short Supplies and “a Disinterested Market” – DTN4-17

    Mississippi: Temperature, Moisture Determine Planting Time4-17

    Moving Grains: Barge Rates Increase with High Water Levels4-16

    USDA Reminds Farmers to Certify Conservation Compliance by June 1 Deadline4-16

    South Carolina Cotton: Counter 20G Not Approved for 20154-16

    U.S. Drought Outlook: Improvements Expected Across the Plains4-16

    Drought Monitor: Mississippi River, Gulf Coast Get Drenched4-16

    Alfalfa Weevils Expected to Be More Active, Scout Fields Regularly – DTN4-16

    U.S. Drought Monitor Quick Look Video – AgFax4-16

    Texas Fertilizer Fire, 2013: What Did We Learn? – DTN4-16

    Wild Hog Wrestling: Don’t Try This at Home – Video4-16

    Good on Grain: Projecting the Corn Balance Sheet, Price Implications4-16

    U.S. Aquaculture Sales: 42% Crustaceans; 57% Alligators From Louisiana4-16

    Texas: 6 Counties Declared Natural Disaster Areas Due to Drought4-16

    Kansas: 2 Counties Declared Natural Disaster Areas; Assistance to Oklahoma4-16

    Grain Risk Management: Alternatives for Soybeans Better than Corn4-16

    Bt Resistance: Straight Talk from Midwest Consultants – Agfax4-15

    Propane Stocks Continue Climb4-15

    Gasoline: Strong Regional Price Movements4-15

    Diesel Prices Move Lower4-15

    5 Tips to Stay Successful in an Ever-Changing Agriculture Market – DTN4-15

    Former Canadian Wheat Board to Be Privatized After U.S., Saudi Buyout – DTN4-15

    5 Business Practices to Take Home From Ethiopian Farmers – DTN4-15

    Texas: 6 Counties Declared Natural Disaster Areas4-15

    Sunbelt Ag Events

    Rice News

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney +