Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Good on Grain: Comparing NASS and FSA Planted Acreage Data

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


The USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released final estimates of planted and harvested crop acreage for 2013 in the Crop Production 2013 Summary report on January 10.  The USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) released its final report of planted acreage for 2013 on January 15.

There may be some misunderstanding or confusion about how the two estimates of planted acreage are generated and how the estimates should compare.




The NASS estimates of planted acreage incorporate both survey and administrative data.  The primary survey data are collected in the December Agricultural Survey of producers.  The survey is conducted by mail, phone, internet, and personal interview in all states except Hawaii.  The survey is a probability survey in the sense that operations surveyed represent a sample drawn from a list of all producers in such a way that all operations have a chance to be included.  The December 2013 survey was conducted between November 29 and December 17 with a sample size of 82,403 (NASS executive summary, released on January 10, 2014).

Respondents are asked to report the acreage of each crop planted for all purposes for all land operated by the respondent.  Based on the survey data, each state Field Office submits an estimate and written analysis to the NASS Agricultural Statistics Board. The survey data and written analysis are used along with administrative data to prepare the final estimates of planted acreage, harvested acreage, yield, and production.  The administrative data are primarily the planted acreage data reported to and summarized by the FSA.

The FSA requires producers participating in the direct and counter-cyclical payment program and the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program along with those who receive marketing assistance loans or loan deficiency payments to file an annual report regarding all cropland use on their farms. Producers self-report to the FSA, but the failure to file an accurate and timely report can result in the loss of program benefits.  Producers report planted acreage, prevented acreage, and failed acreage by crop.

The planted acreage data collected by the FSA should be very accurate, but are incomplete because not all producers are required to report.  In contrast, the NASS estimates are for all planted acreage, but the estimates are subject to sampling error since not every producer is surveyed.  The NASS estimates of planted acreage of each crop should be larger than the FSA estimates since not all producers participate in FSA programs.  The relationship between the two estimates should be generally consistent from year to year since NASS uses the FSA estimates as input for final estimates.  Variation in the magnitude of the differences from year to year could reflect such things as differing rates of participation in FSA programs and NASS sampling errors.

For 2013, the final NASS estimate of planted acreage of corn was 95.365 million acres while the final acreage reported to FSA was 92.399 million acres.  The difference was 2.966 million acres, with the FSA acreage estimate representing 96.89 percent of the NASS estimate.  These relationships are within the range of the differences in the previous six years when the difference between the two estimates ranged from 2.381 million acres to 3.295 million acres and the FSA estimate ranged from 96.42 to 97.45 percent of the NASS estimate.

For soybeans, the final NASS estimate of planted acreage in 2013 was 76.533 million acres, while the final acreage reported to FSA was 75.299 million acres.  The difference was 1.234 million acres, with the FSA acreage estimate representing 98.39 percent of the NASS estimate.  These relationships are within the range of the differences in the previous six years when the difference between the two estimates ranged from 0.917 million acres to 1.884 million acres and the FSA estimate ranged from 97.09 to 98.79 percent of the NASS estimate.

For wheat, the final NASS estimate of planted acreage in 2013 was 56.156 million acres while the final acreage reported to FSA was 53.775 million acres.  The difference was 2.381 million acres, with the FSA acreage estimate representing 95.76 percent of the NASS estimate.  These relationships are within the range of the differences in the previous six years when the difference between the two estimates ranged from 1.171 million acres to 2.779 million acres and the FSA estimate ranged from 94.81 to 98.06 percent of the NASS estimate.

The relationship between FSA and NASS planted acreage estimates can be useful in forming early expectations of the NASS final acreage estimates. FSA releases reports of planted acreage monthly from August through January, reflecting the producer reports received and processed to date.

Beginning In October, NASS formally uses the FSA estimates as input into their estimates.  In most years, however, the September FSA estimates are close to the final FSA estimates, or can be used to anticipate final FSA estimates, and therefore final NASS estimates. The FSA estimates in September 2013, for example, provided an early indication that NASS September corn and soybean acreage estimates were too high, having not yet fully reflected the magnitude of prevented plantings.

To see the original article click here.

Darrel Good


Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    This Week in U.S. Rice: Cooler Nights Helping the Crop8-1

    Peanuts: “Wormy” Year Continues In SE; Crop In West Looks Nice – AgFax8-1

    Rice Market Update: Sideways and Down by Week’s End8-1

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Futures Significanly Lower Despite Cash Premiums8-1

    Grain TV: Weather Forecast Drives Corn, Beans Lower8-1

    Missouri Rice: Wintersteiger Delta Plot Combine Comes to the Bootheel8-1

    Corn and Soybeans: Expected Price Distributions for 20148-1

    Weekly Cotton Market Review: Regional Summaries8-1

    Arkansas Rice Expo Draws 1K People for Farming, Family, and Food8-1

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Corn, Soybeans Fall, Wheat Mostly Higher8-1

    AFB Cotton Close: Oversold Market Ekes Modest Gains8-1

    AFB Rice Close: Futures Testing Support8-1

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights8-1

    DTN Cotton Close: Rallies from New Low to Close Higher8-1

    DTN Grain Close: Rain Anticipation Sends Corn, Beans Lower8-1

    DTN Livestock Midday: Triple-Digit Losses Swamp Cattle Pits8-1

    Corn: Are 2 Ears Better Than 1? That is the Question — DTN8-1

    DTN Grain Midday: Soybeans 18 to 22 Lower8-1

    DTN Cotton Open: Falls to Another New Contract Low8-1

    DTN Livestock Open: Pressure Likely in Cattle Futures8-1

    DTN Grain Open: Corn, Soybeans Begin Lower8-1

    Louisiana: Farmers Voice Concerns About Clean Water Act8-1

    Keith Good: ‘Exceptional’ Drought Now Covers 58% of California8-1

    Doane Cotton Close: Crop Conditions Up, Prices Down7-31

    Soybeans: Conditions Favorable for Sudden Death Syndrome Development – DTN7-31

    2 Safety Nets Could Protect Farmers from Low Prices, Say Economists7-31

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Wheat, Corn Inspections for Export Sink7-31

    U.S. Energy: Global Growth in Gasoline Use Outpacing Diesel7-31

    Gasoline Prices: Decrease by 5 Cents7-31

    Propane Stocks: Continue to Rise7-31

    Diesel Prices: Average Drops a Penny7-31

    Georgia Corn: Growers Warned About Southern Corn Rust7-31

    Corn Looking Good in Midwest; Soybeans Need Rain – AgFax7-30

    Cotton – Southwest Growers Seeing More Disease, Insects – AgFax7-30

    Cleveland on Cotton: Harvest Weather Dictates Market’s Next Big Move7-30

    First U.S. Soybean Crop for the Year Harvested in South Texas7-30

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Slow Season Expected for Fertilizer Booking7-30

    Cotton In Southeast – Stink Bugs Build But Plant Bugs, Aphids Linger – AgFax7-30

    Peanut Stocks and Processing: Utilization Up 2% from Last Year7-30

    Virginia Ag Expo, Lottsburg, Aug. 77-30

    AgFax Cotton Review: Possible Rise in Chinese Imports; Pigweed Problems in Texas7-30

    Endangered Species Act Reform Passes House — DTN7-30

    USDA Preps for Possible Invasion by Old World Bollworm — DTN7-30

    On-Farm Operation Audit is Good Management Tool – DTN7-29

    Mississippi: MSU Wild Hog Research Needs Foresters, Farmers7-29

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices7-29

    AgFax Grain Review: Chinese Trade Issues Continue; Navy to Purchase 37M Gallons of Biofuels7-29

    Crop Progress: Corn, Soybean Conditions Decline, Still at Historical Highs – DTN7-28

    DDGs: China Issues New Import Rules, U.S. Unlikely to Comply – DTN7-28

    Cattle: Minimizing the Risk of Scours — DTN7-28

    Good on Grain: Storing the 2014 Corn Crop7-28

    DTN Fertilizer Outlook: Domestic Ammonia Prices Down Slightly7-28

    Flint on Crops: Challenges for Farmers Keep Coming, Keep Changing7-28

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney