Monday, January 28, 2013

Kansas: Farmland Values May be Higher Than Traditional Surveys Show

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


A new Kansas State University study indicates that using sales transaction data in determining the value of Kansas farmland shows a higher – in some cases significantly higher – value for the land than the traditional survey method derived from producer estimates of farmland value.

“The current growth in land values and the many businesses and personal decisions affected by these values warranted more extensive analysis to obtain estimates that were less aggregated than either the state or crop reporting district-level values that were available,” said K-State Research and Extension agricultural economist Mykel Taylor. “For this study, we obtained sales transaction data from the Kansas Property Valuation Department, which reflect agricultural land sales in Kansas.”

A paper outlining the study is available online here.

 

Taylor, along with K-State agricultural economist Kevin Dhuyvetter, embarked on the study in part because state budget cuts in 2009 forced changes in the way land values are reported in Kansas. Prior to 2009, the Kansas Agricultural Statistics Service conducted farmer surveys which allowed land values to be reported at the crop reporting district (CRD) level. There are nine such districts in the state.

“Unfortunately, the CRD-level estimates reported by KAS were discontinued in 2009, so now, no official government-reported data exist of regional values,” Taylor said.

KAS does, however, report state average values for irrigated, non-irrigated, and pasture land, based on an annual survey of agricultural producers, asking for their estimate of the value of cropland and pasture land they operate.

Several potential problems exist with these data, however, Taylor said. “The data for these estimates is a survey of people’s opinions, which may not be highly attuned to the current land market.”

For example, she added, the KAS data have typically lagged behind estimates based on market data, suggesting that changes in land values are moving faster than people not actively engaged in the land markets realize.

Turning to the PVD data for a market-based estimate of land values, the team looked only at undeveloped parcels of land at least 40 acres in size, and only considered non-irrigated cropland and pasture. Characteristics such as parcel size, soil quality rating, percent of pasture and cropland within a parcel, and when a parcel was sold were all used to estimate county-level land values.

“In all cases, the survey-based estimates are lower than the market-based estimates derived from sales transaction data,” Taylor said. “For non-irrigated cropland, the analysis using PVD transactions data suggests a state-level value of $2,516 an acre, a 48 percent increase over the 2012 KAS-reported value of $1,700 an acre.
Across the nine crop reporting districts, the differences range from a 15.4 percent increase over KAS values in the Southeast Crop Reporting District, to an 80.6 percent increase in the Northwest CRD.”

Pasture values are similarly understated by the survey method, she added, noting that the transactions data estimate of $1,589 per acre for the state is 67.2 percent higher than the KAS-reported value for 2012. Regional differences range from a 17.5 percent increase in the Southeast to a 150.8 percent increase over KAS pasture value for the Northwest CRD.

Cropland Rental Rates Also Understated

A separate part of the study that looked at cash rental rates also indicated that USDA-KAS estimates are significantly lower than cash rent estimates using a method of calculating revenue from a crop share arrangement. The decision aid used to guide the latter is the KSU-Lease.xls Excel spreadsheet (here).

“As with crop and pasture land values, many people want to know how recent changes in both the land and commodity markets have affected rental rates for cropland,” K-State’s Taylor said.

Historically, the ratio of cash rent-to-land value (rent-to-value ratio) has been in the range of 5 to 7 percent, she said. This ratio indicates the annual return landowners can expect on their capital investment from renting land out, excluding capital gains. If that relationship still holds, then a state-level estimate for non-irrigated cropland of $2,516 per acre would imply cash rental rates ranging from about $126 to $176 per acre.

“That leaves a large amount of negotiating room for landowners and tenants,” Taylor added, which prompted the economists to use another method. Rather than targeting a particular rate of return on non-irrigated cropland, which may or may not reflect the productivity of the land or current crop prices, cash rents were estimated using a method of calculating revenue from a crop share arrangement.

A comparison of the rental rates from USDA-KAS and those estimated using the KSU-Lease.xls crop share approach adjusted for risk reveals the USDA-KAS estimates are significantly lower – as much as 71.6 percent in the Southwest CRD and 57.4 percent in the Central CRD.

The higher rental rates estimated by Taylor and Dhuyvetter reflect current grain prices, which have been strong. However, any changes in either expected commodity prices or yields (from a continuation of the drought, for example) will alter the rental rate estimates.

“The most important part of negotiating equitable rental rates is to recognize that market and production conditions may change quickly, making continued communication essential to long-term profits for both farmers and landowners,” Taylor said.

Tags: , , ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Midwest Corn And Soybean Yields – Our Readers’ Reports – AgFax11-22

    Rice Comment: The Case for Neonicotinoid Seed Treatment11-22

    U.S. Rice: Rain Stalls Texas 2nd Crop Harvest; Crop Sales Continue11-22

    Rice Market: Sale to Iraq Moves the Market11-22

    AgFax Grain Review: Syngenta Lawsuits Pile Up; GMO Seed Companies Sue Hawaii11-21

    Rose on Cotton: Looking for the Positives This Week11-21

    Grain Drying: What Happens After Sudden Temperature Drop?11-21

    Is Your Lifestyle Costing You the Farm?11-21

    Grain TV: Lower Barge Rates Boost Basis Levels11-21

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Futures Solidly Higher11-21

    Farmers Storing Grain Need to Weigh Risk Management Factors – DTN11-21

    Peanut Harvest Updates From Southeast, Delta And Southwest – AgFax11-21

    Cleveland on Cotton: 57 Cents – ‘The Bottom is In’11-21

    Ag Labor: Immigration Order Provides Little Long-Term Benefit – DTN11-21

    Doane Cotton Close: Decline in Chinese Production Offers Support11-21

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Strong Soybean Gains, Little Movement in Corn, Wheat11-21

    Southern Soybean, Corn Harvest Reports, Round One – AgFax11-21

    AFB Cotton Close: Futures Rebound11-21

    AFB Rice Close: Prices See More Slight Gains11-21

    DTN Cotton Close: Settles Higher on Light Volume11-21

    DTN Grain Close: Soybeans Boosted by Demand11-21

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights11-21

    Oklahoma Pecans: Deliveries Remain Light11-21

    Georgia Pecans: Buying Interest Very Active11-21

    Ag Policy: Farm Bills Need Long-Term View11-21

    Cotton Market Weekly Review by Region11-21

    DTN Livestock Midday: Cattle Futures Surge Higher11-21

    A Closer Look at Impacts of Olympic Averaging of Prices and Yields11-21

    Arkansas Cattle: Ranchers Should be Alert to Acorn Poisoning11-21

    DTN Grain Midday: All 3 Commodities Go Higher11-21

    Economist: Livestock Industry Will Have Strong Rebound11-21

    DTN Dried Distillers Grain: Cheaper Feed Source for Beef Producers?11-21

    Mississippi Outdoors: Common Deer Parasites Do Not Affect Venison11-21

    DTN Cotton Open: Trades Higher after No Notices Issued11-21

    AgFax Wildlife Review: New E-Book Offers Tips for Gardening in South11-21

    DTN Livestock Open: Cattle Futures to Start Mixed11-21

    Weather Challenges Florida and Iowa Farms — DTN11-21

    Vilsack: Immigration Order Creates ‘Stability’ in Ag Work Force — DTN11-21

    DTN Grain Open: Lower Start Across Board11-21

    Keith Good: What’s Next for Meat Labeling?; Sugar Prices Take Tumble11-21

    Texas Cotton Harvest – Still Some To Go – AgFax11-20

    Mississippi: Water Conservation Summit, Stoneville, Dec. 1011-20

    Farm Internet Service Still Slow or Non-Existent, But Improving – DTN11-20

    Yield: Important Factor in Your Irrevocable Farm Program Choice11-20

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Weekly Inspections Reach Record11-20

    U.S. Drought Outlook: Improvements Expected for California, Southwest11-20

    U.S. Energy: Planned Refinery Maintenance Light in 201411-20

    Propane Stocks: Post Slight Increase11-20

    Gasoline Prices: Decrease by 5 Cents11-20

    Diesel Prices: Average Drops 2 Cents11-20

    Livestock: Arctic Chill Catches Markets Flatfooted – DTN11-19

    Farm Runoff Targeted for Regulation Following Algal Bloom Shutdown – DTN11-19

    Soybeans: China May Import More Non-GMO Beans – DTN11-19

    Mississippi Outdoors: Free Apps Can Aid Deer Hunters11-19

    Big River Rice And Grain Enhances, Expands Facilities In Arkansas, Louisiana11-19

    Farm Bill Commodity Program: Decisions and More Decisions11-18

    Young Farmers: USDA is the ‘Lender of 1st Opportunity’ – DTN11-18

    Tax Extenders: Farm Groups Push Congress to Renew Section 179 This Year – DTN11-18

    AgFax Rice Review: Iraq Passes on U.S. Rice; Australia, China Sign FTA11-18

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices11-18

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Prices Show Little Movement11-18

    North Carolina: Bt Resistant Armyworms Migrating North11-18

    Georgia Cotton Commission Meeting, Production Workshop, Tifton, Jan. 2811-18

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney