Thursday, April 26, 2012

First Draft of the New Senate Farm Bill

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


On April 21, 2012, what is called the Chair Mark for the 2012 Farm Bill was released by Senator Deborah Stabenow, Chair, of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. This is the first publically released draft of the 2012 Farm Bill. The Chair Mark will form the basis for deliberations by the Committee as it completes writing the Farm Bill. This article summarizes provisions in the farm bill that concern the safety net for U.S. crops: The provisions are in Title I, Commodity Programs, and Title XI, Crop Insurance.

 
 


2012 Farm Bill Crop Safety Net for 2013-2017 Crop Years

(1) Marketing Loans retained.
• Loan rates remain the same as for the 2012 crop year, except cotton’s loan rate can be lowered.

(2) Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) program created.
• Farmer makes a 1-time, irrevocable election to participate in individual farm ARC or county ARC if county has sufficient data.

(3) Crop Insurance retained and adds new Supplemental Coverage Option that allows individual insurance to be supplemented with county insurance to cover all or part of the individual insurance deductible.
• makes 2008 Farm Bill pilot program for enterprise crop insurance permanent
• insurance APH yield will be calculated using 70%, instead of 60%, of insurance transitional yield
• irrigated and non-irrigated enterprise insurance is to be made available in counties
• any future Standard Reinsurance Agreement should be budget neutral
• separate insurance program is created for cotton, called the Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX)

Program Parameters that apply to both Individual and County ARC Programs

► Crops covered: wheat, corn, sorghum, barley, oats, long grain and medium grain rice, pulse crops, soybeans, other oilseeds, peanuts

► Payments are made on an individual crop basis.

► The election is for the entire farm operation, not for an individual FSA farm.

► Coverage is for losses between 11% and 21% relative to the benchmark value.

► For a covered crop, eligible acres are all acres planted or prevented from being planted to the crop on a farm during a crop year.
• A farm’s total eligible acres cannot exceed its average eligible acres for the 2009-2012 crops.

► Election decision applies to all acres under operational control of the farmer, including acres added after the election.
• Acres that change farms are subject to the election decision of the new farmer.
• Conservation Reserve acres converted back to cropland can be added to eligible acres.

► Benchmark values are calculated to the extent practicable for irrigated and non-irrigated acres.

► Limit on payment per payment entity per year is $50,000 for peanuts and $50,000 for all other covered crops.

• In general, the rules for determining a payment entity are the same as in the 2008 Farm Bill.

► No payments can be received if a payment entity’s average adjusted gross income over the 3 preceding taxable years exceeds $900,000 (Adjusted Gross Income Limitation).

► Conservation compliance and wetland protection must be met to be eligible for ARC payments.

tab1c.jpg

Summary Observations

This farm bill draft clearly moves the U.S. farm safety net in the direction of risk management. The elimination of direct payments, creation of ARC, and enhancements to crop insurance all support this observation.

A commonly-expressed desire for this Farm Bill was to reduce overlap in farm programs. This objective is clearly, but only partly accomplished by limiting the ARC program to losses between 11% and 21% as compared with the larger range of losses covered by both ACRE and SURE. However, because different prices and yields are used to determine the ARC benchmark value and the insurance plant guarantee values, overlap continues to exist. For the 2012 crop year, the estimated benchmark price for ACR for Illinois corn, soybeans, and wheat is less than the insurance plant (expected) price. Thus, the programs would cover some of the same losses. The only ways to eliminate all overlap is to more formally merge the insurance and commodity programs or to make the ARC program effective only if its benchmark revenue exceeds the crop insurance guarantee revenue. At present, neither of these two options is likely to be politically acceptable.
fig1.jpg
Should ARC come into existence, farmers will have to decide if they want to enroll in the individual or county ARC program. In addressing this question, a key question will be whether, over the 2013-2017 crop years, farmers expect the greatest risk to be (1) low yield on their farm or (2) low market price. The individual farm ARC provides protection for yield losses on the individual farm. However, the county ARC has a higher coverage rate (75% vs. 60%). Thus, the county ARC provides more protection for losses that occur due to yield losses over larger areas or because of low prices (i.e., losses not due to individual low yields). Future farmdoc articles will look at this decision in more detail, as well as how expected payments will vary across the U.S. by crop and region.

From the perspective of managing risk, the $50,000 limit on ARC payments per payment entity is a key issue. Risk management programs like ARC will make large payments when a farm experiences a sizable loss. However, occurrence of such a loss is not known until after the crop is planted. To limit payments when they are most needed undermines the program and makes the management of farm risk much more difficult. From the perspective of helping farmers manage risk and assuming there is a desire to help small farms more than large farms, it would be better to reduce the share of losses covered for larger farms. For example, a farm with less than 100 acres could receive payment on losses between 11% and 21% while a farm with over 2000 acres could receive payment on losses between 16% and 21%. This type of limit would not restrict payments when a large loss occurs, thus providing assurance to the farmer that ARC will cover these losses. As important, the farmer can then make other risk management decisions knowing what losses will be covered.

Farmers also will have to decide if they want to use the Supplemental Insurance Option to replace individual insurance with a combination of individual and county coverage through this new program. The only observation I feel comfortable making at the present time is that this option could be an important tool to better allow a farmer to customize risk management to the risks his/her farm confronts.

Last, this is a draft farm bill. The Bill must be passed by both the House and Senate and signed by the President. In addition, as part of the agreement to address the Brazilian cotton case with the World Trade Organization, Brazil will have to decide if it finds the proposed cotton program acceptable and what actions they will take if they find the cotton program unacceptable. In short, there are lots of steps yet to be taken before the farm bill is finalized. Much discussion will occur and changes will be made.


Tags:


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Grain TV: Markets Hit by Selling Pressure10-30

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Complex Enjoys Short-Covering Rally10-30

    Doane Cotton Close: Strong Exports Continue10-30

    ELS Cotton Competitive Payment Rate Is Zero10-30

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Strong Exports Unable to Support Prices10-30

    AFB Cotton Close: Futures Retrace Gains10-30

    AFB Rice Close: Futures Turn Strongly Lower10-30

    Biodiesel: 2014 A Tough Year for Producers10-30

    DTN Cotton Close: Reverses off New High to End Lower10-30

    Kansas Officials Point Out Flaws in Clean Water Act – DTN10-30

    DTN Grain Close: Rally Pauses as Prices Backtrack10-30

    Ag Secretary Discusses Challenges Facing Future Farmers — DTN10-30

    DTN Livestock Midday: Sharp Losses Develop in Hog Futures10-30

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Barge Rates Remain Well Above Average10-30

    Mississippi: Fall Tests for Nematodes Help Keep Crops Healthy10-30

    DTN Grain Midday: Trade is Flat to Lower10-30

    DTN Cotton Open: Futures Tick Near Unchanged10-30

    California’s SJV Included in Report on Soil Loss to Salt Damage10-30

    U.S. Energy: Gas Prices Drop to Lowest Since December 201010-30

    Gasoline Prices: Average Drops 6 Cents10-30

    Propane Stocks: Down 1.3M Barrels10-30

    Diesel Prices: Decrease by 2 Cents10-30

    New Research Study Shows the Value of Neonics10-30

    DTN Livestock Open: Futures Staged for Mixed Start10-30

    DTN Grain Open: Markets Extend Rally Overnight10-30

    Keith Good: Drought Impacts California Rice; Farm Land Market Cools10-30

    Texas: Pecos County Pesticide Workshop, Fort Stockton, Nov. 1810-29

    Florida: Sugarcane Field Day, Quincy, Nov. 310-29

    Texas Wildlife: New Deer Management App Just in Time for Deer Season10-29

    Peanut Stocks: Utilization Up 6%, Stocks Total 1.2B Pounds10-29

    Texas Pecans: Fairly Light Deliveries, Good Demand10-29

    Louisiana Pecans: Deliveries Insufficient to Establish Prices10-29

    Georgia Pecans: Buying Interest Fairly Active10-29

    Georgia: Brooks County Clean Day Rescheduled to Nov. 1210-29

    AgFax Cotton Review: U.S.’s High Quality Offers Market Resilience10-29

    Georgia: USDA Designates Early County Primary Natural Disaster Area10-29

    China Consumers Often Misled on GMO Food Issues — DTN10-29

    DTN Fertilizer Outlook: Demand May Fall with Crop Prices10-29

    Grain Market Math Test, Part 2 — DTN10-29

    Welch on Wheat: Crop Condition Right on Average10-28

    Welch on Grain: Corn Harvest Runs Behind but Conditions Remain High10-28

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices10-28

    Mississippi Wild Hogs: Trapping Is the Best Control Method10-28

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Stubborn Prices Pose Dilemma for Grain Farmers10-28

    What Happens to Corn Prices When Stock Market Falls? — DTN10-28

    Georgia Peanuts: Spider Mite Damage Rises in Dry Weather10-28

    Vilsack: COOL Appeal Decision to be Made in January — DTN10-27

    Livestock: Record Cattle Prices, Again and Again10-27

    AgFax Rice Review: Defense Against Arsenic; Japan’s Modernization10-27

    Mandatory COOL: Detrimental to Trade, No Easy Solution — Economist10-27

    Group Works to Improve Fertilizer Efficiency — DTN10-27

    Shurley on Cotton: Lackluster Week Closes on High Note10-27

    China’s U.S. Corn Rejections Prompt New Business — DTN10-27

    Flint on Crops: Mississippi Snow Arrives in October10-27

    Rice Market: Technical Indicators Remain in “Sell” Mode10-24

    Rice Crop: Harvest Nearly Complete, Ratoon Harvest to Start Soon10-24

    Rose on Cotton: Increased Export Competition with India10-24

    Sunbelt Ag Events

    Rice News

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney