Monday, April 23, 2012

Iowa: How Much Crop Residue to Remove

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop residue removal — what effect does it have on corn yield and soil quality? That’s a question quite often asked these days.

The adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems help keep significant amounts of crop residue on the soil surface, which can create management challenges, especially in areas with wet and cold soil conditions. Also, more acres of continuous corn are being grown, which leads to a greater amount of crop residue on fields compared to corn-soybean rotation. These higher levels of crop residue bring more challenges for farmers.


Increased use of no-till and other conservation systems helps sustain the soil quality and improve environmental quality by reducing soil erosion. However, in the near future corn residue could be removed from fields for cellulosic ethanol production in addition to current animal uses. This trend may encourage the switch to continuous corn, which can lead to high N application and more conventional tillage. The increase in conventional tillage coupled with high use of nitrogen fertilizer in continuous corn will present a significant soil and water quality challenge.

The trend to more continuous corn, more crop residue removal, higher rates of nitrogen applied and potentially more tillage will present economic and environmental challenges that we need to consider.

The use of corn stover for cellulosic ethanol production or any other use should be weighed against the potential impact on soil productivity, environmental consequences and food availability. That’s why researchers are looking at the potential for crops like miscanthus and switchgrass for making cellulosic ethanol. To strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability, alternative perennial biomass sources for cellulosic ethanol production are being explored to combine with corn grain ethanol.


The value of crop residue is obvious.

How much residue to harvest?

The main crop Iowa grows is corn and the crop residue corn produces each year is the most readily available feedstock for making cellulosic ethanol and for animal use. But that residue plays a very important role in sustaining soil quality which must be kept in mind when deciding how much corn stover to harvest and how much to leave on a field.

Leaving crop residue on the soil surface will improve the cycling of nutrients and ultimately soil quality, both of which increase and sustain soil productivity. Corn residue left on the field after harvest is a critical source of soil organic matter; it provides protection for the soil against water and wind erosion; and it contributes to the improvement of soil and water quality.

Alternative uses of corn residue for various purposes, such as baling the residue for livestock use or for cellulosic ethanol production, needs to be approached carefully. Removal of too much crop residue potentially can have adverse effects on soil and water quality.

How much corn residue can be safely removed from a field? Sustainable stover removal rates depend on several factors such as soil erodibility, surface slope, cultural practices and climate conditions. Recent studies suggest that only 20 to 30 percent of the total stover production could be removed for biofuel, based on ground cover requirements to control soil erosion. However, other studies suggest that residue removal should be lower than 20 percent, especially with conventional tillage, in order to maintain soil quality and nutrient cycling for long-term soil productivity.

Consider long-term effects of residue removal

The impact of crop residue removal on soil productivity and environmental quality is not a short-term outcome, particularly in the Midwest, where high organic matter, high soil productivity and good agriculture production conditions mask the short-term effect of residue removal.

Possible short-term impacts of corn stover removal may include an increase in amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and other nutrients that need to be applied to replace these nutrients lost due to crop residue removal. Potential deficiencies of nutrients and decline of organic matter in the soil are both the long-term impacts. It was estimated that nutrients replacement cost due to corn residue removal was approximately $20 per ton of removed corn residue. These nutrients will be permanently lost from the soil system nutrients pool due to lack of replenishment from crop residue and they have to be added to maintain soil productivity.

Keep in mind that when you harvest corn crop residue from a field, a significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed. Using no-till and above agronomic nitrogen fertilizer rate may help in reducing soil organic matter loss in the short-term due to crop residue removal.

Key Points:

• What else do you remove when you harvest corn crop residue from a field?
• A significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed.
• Using no-till and adequate N application rates may minimize soil organic matter loss due to residue removal in the short-term.

Tags: ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Southern Grain: Freeze Effects? Corn Planting Slogs Along – AgFax4-19

    Rose On Cotton: Export Sales, Shipments Bear Watching4-18

    Arctic Warming Tied to Our Extreme Weather? Maybe. – DTN4-18

    Do Soybeans Need Nitrogen?4-18

    Is There An Advantage To More Corn Acres in Your Rotation? Yes and No.4-18

    Texas Rice: Garry McCauley Retires After 39 Years and Many Accomplishments4-18

    Keith Good: China’s Secret – Contaminated Farmland; Expect Drought Persistence4-18

    Rice Farmers In Midsouth Looking For A Break In The Weather – AgFax4-18

    Cleveland on Cotton: Nervous Market Nellies; Chinese Plant 20-25% Less4-17

    Grain TV: River Basis Levels See Large Rise4-17

    AgFax Grain Review: Corn Production Moves to Canada; Soybean Cyst Nematodes Unaffected by Cold4-17

    DTN Livestock Close: Meat Futures Take Wide Swings Before Exiting for Holiday4-17

    Doane Cotton Close: Heavy Volatility Continues in Old-Crop Prices4-17

    Chumrau on Wheat: World Supplies Get a Lift, but U.S. Stocks Look Tight4-17

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Wheat Higher, Corn Down, Beans Mixed4-17

    AFB Cotton Close: New-Crop Continues to Show Strength4-17

    AFB Rice Close: Across the Board Losses4-17

    DTN Cotton Close: Finishes Mixed Ahead of Long Weekend4-17

    Mississippi: MSU Offers Four Deer Management Workshops This Summer4-17

    Mapping the Farm Bill: Voting Changes in the House of Representatives4-17

    DTN Grain Close: Markets Mixed Ahead of Holiday Weekend4-17

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights4-17

    Texas: Grain Grading Workshops, Amarillo, May 6-74-17

    Mississippi: State Soybean Value Grew $1B Since 20064-17

    U.S. Drought Outlook: Improvement Expected in Midwest, Central and Southern Great Plains4-17

    Farm Finances Rate an ‘A’ For Now, but Questions Linger — DTN4-17

    DTN Livestock Midday: Sharp Losses Hold in Cattle Trade4-17

    Mississippi: Top of the List for Water Resouces4-17

    DTN Grain Midday: Corn, Soybeans Move Lower4-17

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Upper Mississippi Navigation Improves4-17

    Resistant Palmer Pigweed: What People Need To Know Before It Hits – AgFax4-17

    Chemical Safety Board Plans Meeting in West, Texas — DTN4-17

    West, Texas, Recovers and Rebuilds with Cautious Approach — DTN4-17

    DTN Cotton Open: Trades Slightly Lower Nearby4-17

    U.S. Energy: Oil and Gas Spending Favors Exploration, Development4-17

    Gasoline Prices: Average Jumps 6 Cents4-17

    Propane Stocks: Increase by 0.8M Barrels4-17

    Diesel Prices: Average Down a Penny4-17

    DTN Livestock Open: Meat Contracts to Start Lower4-17

    Victims of Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion Remembered — DTN4-17

    DTN Grain Open: Higher Start Led by Soybeans4-17

    Keith Good: Beige Book — Observations on Ag Economy4-17

    “Agricultural Adventure” Educate Public on Modern Farming – DTN4-16

    International Buying and Selling a Balancing Act to Get the Best Deal – DTN4-16

    AgFax Rice Review: Recent Rains Won’t Help CA Farmers; Japanese Varieties Grown in U.S.4-16

    Weather Woes Stretch from Iowa to Florida — DTN4-16

    Brazil’s Ports Remain Orderly with Good Luck, Favorable Conditions – DTN4-15

    Texas: Conservation Farming Meeting Weslaco, April 294-15

    Welch on Wheat: Cool Temperatures Hit Drought Stressed Crop4-15

    N.C. State University Leads Research into Kudzu Bug Host Preferences4-15

    Welch on Grain: Corn Planting in Line with 30 Year Average4-15

    Fertilizer Prices on the Rise but Still Lower Than Last Few Years4-15

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices4-15

    Louisiana: Wildlife Field Day, Clinton, May 34-15

    Sign Ups Begin for USDA Disaster Assistance Programs4-15

    AgFax Cotton Review: Now’s a Good Time to Price New-Crop; Rains in Texas but Not Enough4-15

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Rail Delays Affecting Prices in Upper Midwest4-15

    Crop Progress: 3% of National Corn Crop Planted, Wheat Continues Decline – US-DA4-14

    Louisiana: Glyphosate Resistance Confirmed in Italian Ryegrass4-14

    Livestock: Rancher Raises Horns, Not Pounds for Rodeo Cattle – DTN4-14

    Good on Grain: Corn Consumption Continues to Exceed Projections4-14

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney