Monday, April 23, 2012

Iowa: How Much Crop Residue to Remove

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop residue removal — what effect does it have on corn yield and soil quality? That’s a question quite often asked these days.

The adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems help keep significant amounts of crop residue on the soil surface, which can create management challenges, especially in areas with wet and cold soil conditions. Also, more acres of continuous corn are being grown, which leads to a greater amount of crop residue on fields compared to corn-soybean rotation. These higher levels of crop residue bring more challenges for farmers.

 

Increased use of no-till and other conservation systems helps sustain the soil quality and improve environmental quality by reducing soil erosion. However, in the near future corn residue could be removed from fields for cellulosic ethanol production in addition to current animal uses. This trend may encourage the switch to continuous corn, which can lead to high N application and more conventional tillage. The increase in conventional tillage coupled with high use of nitrogen fertilizer in continuous corn will present a significant soil and water quality challenge.

The trend to more continuous corn, more crop residue removal, higher rates of nitrogen applied and potentially more tillage will present economic and environmental challenges that we need to consider.

The use of corn stover for cellulosic ethanol production or any other use should be weighed against the potential impact on soil productivity, environmental consequences and food availability. That’s why researchers are looking at the potential for crops like miscanthus and switchgrass for making cellulosic ethanol. To strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability, alternative perennial biomass sources for cellulosic ethanol production are being explored to combine with corn grain ethanol.


The value of crop residue is obvious.

How much residue to harvest?

The main crop Iowa grows is corn and the crop residue corn produces each year is the most readily available feedstock for making cellulosic ethanol and for animal use. But that residue plays a very important role in sustaining soil quality which must be kept in mind when deciding how much corn stover to harvest and how much to leave on a field.

Leaving crop residue on the soil surface will improve the cycling of nutrients and ultimately soil quality, both of which increase and sustain soil productivity. Corn residue left on the field after harvest is a critical source of soil organic matter; it provides protection for the soil against water and wind erosion; and it contributes to the improvement of soil and water quality.

Alternative uses of corn residue for various purposes, such as baling the residue for livestock use or for cellulosic ethanol production, needs to be approached carefully. Removal of too much crop residue potentially can have adverse effects on soil and water quality.

How much corn residue can be safely removed from a field? Sustainable stover removal rates depend on several factors such as soil erodibility, surface slope, cultural practices and climate conditions. Recent studies suggest that only 20 to 30 percent of the total stover production could be removed for biofuel, based on ground cover requirements to control soil erosion. However, other studies suggest that residue removal should be lower than 20 percent, especially with conventional tillage, in order to maintain soil quality and nutrient cycling for long-term soil productivity.

Consider long-term effects of residue removal

The impact of crop residue removal on soil productivity and environmental quality is not a short-term outcome, particularly in the Midwest, where high organic matter, high soil productivity and good agriculture production conditions mask the short-term effect of residue removal.

Possible short-term impacts of corn stover removal may include an increase in amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and other nutrients that need to be applied to replace these nutrients lost due to crop residue removal. Potential deficiencies of nutrients and decline of organic matter in the soil are both the long-term impacts. It was estimated that nutrients replacement cost due to corn residue removal was approximately $20 per ton of removed corn residue. These nutrients will be permanently lost from the soil system nutrients pool due to lack of replenishment from crop residue and they have to be added to maintain soil productivity.

Keep in mind that when you harvest corn crop residue from a field, a significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed. Using no-till and above agronomic nitrogen fertilizer rate may help in reducing soil organic matter loss in the short-term due to crop residue removal.

Key Points:

• What else do you remove when you harvest corn crop residue from a field?
• A significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed.
• Using no-till and adequate N application rates may minimize soil organic matter loss due to residue removal in the short-term.


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    DTN Livestock Midday: Cattle Futures Hold Triple-Digit Gains12-18

    Japan Elections Won’t Soften Trade Issues — DTN12-18

    DTN Grain Midday: Firmer Trade Continues for Corn12-18

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Rail Shipments Make Big Jump12-18

    DuPont Pioneer Rolls Out New Soybean And Corn Selections For 201512-18

    Updated ARC-CO and PLC Payment Indicator for 2014 Crop Year12-18

    Livestock: Sharp Cattle Declines as Inscrutable as the Grinch – DTN12-18

    U.S. Drought Outlook: Improvement Expected Across California12-18

    Ag Trade Should Benefit from Thaw in U.S.-Cuba Relations12-18

    DTN Cotton Open: Futures Start Slightly Lower12-18

    U.S. Energy: Heating Oil Expenditures Expected to Drop This Winter12-18

    Gasoline Prices: Decline in All Regions12-18

    Propane Stocks: Decrease by 0.8M Barrels12-18

    Diesel Prices: Average Drops 12 Cents12-18

    DTN Livestock Open: Futures Set for Further Losses12-18

    DTN Grain Open: As Wheat Rises, Others Follow12-18

    Keith Good: Viptera Corn Ban Lifted by China; Wheat Prices Soaring12-18

    Grain TV: Strong Ethanol Production Continues12-17

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Wheat Leads Markets Higher12-17

    AFB Cotton Close: Market Higher in Middle of Consolidation Range12-17

    AFB Rice Close: Higher in Narrow Range12-17

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Continue Limit-Down Streak12-17

    Virginia Govt. Joins USDA, EPA in Fighting Nutrient Runoff – DTN12-17

    Doane Cotton Close: Choppy Sideways Trade Continues12-17

    Texas Pecans: Prices Slightly Higher with Good Demand12-17

    Western Region Pecans: Moderate Deliveries with Good Demand12-17

    Louisiana Pecans: Deliveries Very Light, Few Improved Varieties12-17

    Georgia Pecans: Buying Interest Active Despite Light Deliveries12-17

    Tennessee: TAPA Winter Agronomic Workshop and Cotton Focus, Jackson, Feb. 11-1212-17

    DTN Cotton Close: Jumps to Session High on Fed Statement12-17

    Crop Insurance: Supplemental Coverage Option Unavailable When Choosing ARC Programs12-17

    DTN Grain Close: Wheat Soars Higher On Russian Woes12-17

    Crop Insurance: Choosing Between Base Acre Allocation Alternatives12-17

    Senate Passes Tax Extenders Bill with Key Provisions for Ag — DTN12-17

    Brazil: Amazon Deforestation Issues Concern Ag Communities – DTN12-16

    DTN Fertilizer Outlook: Global Phosphorous Demand to Increase12-16

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices12-16

    Buying Local Not Without Risks, Study Finds12-16

    U.S. Ag in Strong Position with High Avian Flu Risks Elsewhere in ’1512-16

    Grain Markets: 50-Day Moving Average Never Out of Style — DTN12-16

    Kentucky Wheat: Winter Workshop Slated Jan. 6 in Hopkinsville12-16

    Cash Rent Rates Key to Cropland Prices 2015 – DTN12-15

    Sorghum Fights Aphid; Assassin Bug Eats BT-Resist Pests; Downy Brome Control – DTN12-15

    Welch on Wheat: Estimated Average Farm Price Raised12-15

    Welch on Grain: Corn Gets Minor USDA Adjustments12-15

    AgFax Cotton Review: Crop Quality Controls Market; India Eases Export Rules12-15

    Kansas Wheat: New Yield Calculator App Available12-15

    Dow’s Yet Released Insect-Resistant Soybean Trait Branded Conkesta12-15

    Drones: FAA Grants Trimble Inc. an Exemption to Use UX5 in Agriculture12-15

    Senate Appropriations Bill Gets Mixed Reviews from Ag Groups — DTN12-15

    Good on Grain: Corn Price Strength Continues12-15

    Flint on Crops: Courage, Optimism Drive the Successful Farmer12-15

    Roberts on Rice: Mexico Announces 20% Import Tariff on Asian Rice12-14

    Rice Market: Libya Buys 28,800 Tons Medium/Short Grain12-14

    Rose on Cotton: Bearish News? We Got Plenty from USDA.12-12

    Coarse Grain Outlook: Sorghum Prices Projected to Match Corn12-12

    Cleveland on Cotton: USDA Surprise – Texas Yields Lowered; World Carryover Raised12-12

    Rice Outlook: U.S. Export Forecast Raised to 103M Cwt12-12

    Cotton Outlook: Global Trade To Decline in 2014-1512-12

    Oil Crops Outlook: Strong Soybean Exports Support Prices12-12

    Wheat Outlook: Higher Imports Raise 2014/15 U.S. Ending Stocks12-12

    DDG Prices Spike on Rumors of China Re-Entering Market – DTN12-12

    Farm Management: 9 Important Lessons Not Taught at Ag Schools – DTN12-12

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney