Monday, April 23, 2012

Iowa: How Much Crop Residue to Remove

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop residue removal — what effect does it have on corn yield and soil quality? That’s a question quite often asked these days.

The adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems help keep significant amounts of crop residue on the soil surface, which can create management challenges, especially in areas with wet and cold soil conditions. Also, more acres of continuous corn are being grown, which leads to a greater amount of crop residue on fields compared to corn-soybean rotation. These higher levels of crop residue bring more challenges for farmers.




Increased use of no-till and other conservation systems helps sustain the soil quality and improve environmental quality by reducing soil erosion. However, in the near future corn residue could be removed from fields for cellulosic ethanol production in addition to current animal uses. This trend may encourage the switch to continuous corn, which can lead to high N application and more conventional tillage. The increase in conventional tillage coupled with high use of nitrogen fertilizer in continuous corn will present a significant soil and water quality challenge.

The trend to more continuous corn, more crop residue removal, higher rates of nitrogen applied and potentially more tillage will present economic and environmental challenges that we need to consider.

The use of corn stover for cellulosic ethanol production or any other use should be weighed against the potential impact on soil productivity, environmental consequences and food availability. That’s why researchers are looking at the potential for crops like miscanthus and switchgrass for making cellulosic ethanol. To strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability, alternative perennial biomass sources for cellulosic ethanol production are being explored to combine with corn grain ethanol.


The value of crop residue is obvious.

How much residue to harvest?

The main crop Iowa grows is corn and the crop residue corn produces each year is the most readily available feedstock for making cellulosic ethanol and for animal use. But that residue plays a very important role in sustaining soil quality which must be kept in mind when deciding how much corn stover to harvest and how much to leave on a field.

Leaving crop residue on the soil surface will improve the cycling of nutrients and ultimately soil quality, both of which increase and sustain soil productivity. Corn residue left on the field after harvest is a critical source of soil organic matter; it provides protection for the soil against water and wind erosion; and it contributes to the improvement of soil and water quality.

Alternative uses of corn residue for various purposes, such as baling the residue for livestock use or for cellulosic ethanol production, needs to be approached carefully. Removal of too much crop residue potentially can have adverse effects on soil and water quality.

How much corn residue can be safely removed from a field? Sustainable stover removal rates depend on several factors such as soil erodibility, surface slope, cultural practices and climate conditions. Recent studies suggest that only 20 to 30 percent of the total stover production could be removed for biofuel, based on ground cover requirements to control soil erosion. However, other studies suggest that residue removal should be lower than 20 percent, especially with conventional tillage, in order to maintain soil quality and nutrient cycling for long-term soil productivity.

Consider long-term effects of residue removal

The impact of crop residue removal on soil productivity and environmental quality is not a short-term outcome, particularly in the Midwest, where high organic matter, high soil productivity and good agriculture production conditions mask the short-term effect of residue removal.

Possible short-term impacts of corn stover removal may include an increase in amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and other nutrients that need to be applied to replace these nutrients lost due to crop residue removal. Potential deficiencies of nutrients and decline of organic matter in the soil are both the long-term impacts. It was estimated that nutrients replacement cost due to corn residue removal was approximately $20 per ton of removed corn residue. These nutrients will be permanently lost from the soil system nutrients pool due to lack of replenishment from crop residue and they have to be added to maintain soil productivity.

Keep in mind that when you harvest corn crop residue from a field, a significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed. Using no-till and above agronomic nitrogen fertilizer rate may help in reducing soil organic matter loss in the short-term due to crop residue removal.

Key Points:

• What else do you remove when you harvest corn crop residue from a field?
• A significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed.
• Using no-till and adequate N application rates may minimize soil organic matter loss due to residue removal in the short-term.


Tags: ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Grain TV: Positive News for Soybeans10-21

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Futures Move Lower10-21

    Wheat Growers to Seek Inclusion in APH Yield Exclusion for 2015 – DTN10-21

    Doane Cotton Close: Positive Chinese Economy Boosts Prices10-21

    Dual Space Shop Offers Weather Protection, Equipment Storage – DTN10-21

    DTN Cotton Close: Snaps String of Five Lower Finishes10-21

    DTN Grain Close: Higher on Harvest Delay10-21

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices10-21

    USDA to Implement APH Yield Exclusion for 2015 Spring Crops10-21

    DTN Livestock Midday: Light Pressure Redevelops in Hog Futures10-21

    Arkansas: USA Rice Outlook Conference Set Dec. 7-9 in Little Rock10-21

    AgFax Cotton Review: Australian Production on Rise; Mississippi Mill Faces Closure10-21

    DTN Grain Midday: Soybeans Lead Markets Higher10-21

    DTN Cotton Open: Near Unchanged in Tight Ranges10-21

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: High Costs May Alter Growers’ Tactics for 201510-21

    DTN Livestock Open: Cattle Futures to Start Mixed10-21

    DTN Grain Open: Soybeans, Wheat Start Higher10-21

    Keith Good: Tumbling Grain Prices May Prove Costly for Taxpayers10-21

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Wheat, Soybeans Down, Slight Gains in Corn10-20

    AFB Cotton Close: Selling Accelerates10-20

    AFB Rice Close: Reverses Off Positive Early Trade10-20

    Herbicide Resistant Weed Summit’s Slides, Webcast Available Online10-20

    Rice and Sugar: Thailand’s Quest for World Domination10-20

    AgFax Peanut Review: Portales Celebrates Peanuts Despite Plant Uncertainty10-20

    Livestock: WTO Rules Against U.S. in COOL Dispute — DTN10-20

    Wheat Scientists, Breeders Advocate Biotech Crop — DTN10-20

    Good on Grain: Storage Issues May be Less Severe Than Anticipated10-20

    Brazil Soybeans: Planting Falls Further Behind — DTN10-20

    Flint on Crops: Cover Crops Provide Many Benefits10-20

    New Holland Combine Sets Guinness Harvest Record10-18

    Rice Market: Sideways Movement Continues10-17

    Rice Crop: Delta Region Saw Harvest Delays with Storms10-17

    Rose on Cotton: Dec Contract Still Under Pressure10-17

    Cleveland on Cotton: Exports Lowest in ‘My Memory’10-17

    Brazil: Beef Production Steps Up Over Next 10 Years10-17

    Soybeans: Neonic Seed Treatment Little or No Benefit, says EPA – DTN10-17

    Informa Forecast: Soybean Acres Up 4.3M in 2015 – DTN10-17

    DTN Grain Close: Prices Down for the Day, Positive for the Week10-17

    Crop Margins Tighten, Living Expenses Not Far Behind10-17

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights10-17

    Georgia: 6 Counties Declared Natural Disaster Areas10-17

    Livestock: WTO Ruling on Country of Origin Labeling Expected Soon — DTN10-17

    U.S. Energy: Narrowing Brent-WTI Spread Impacts Global Crude Markets10-17

    Gasoline Prices: Show 9-Cent Decline10-17

    Propane Stocks: Rise by 0.7M Barrels10-17

    Diesel Prices: Average Decreases 4 Cents10-17

    Georgia Blueberries: State Leads Nation in Production — 96M Pounds10-17

    Farm Bill Contingency Plans: How Optimistic are You? – DTN10-16

    Arkansas Agriculture Secretary Calhoun Retiring10-16

    Georgia: Waste Pesticide Disposal, Quitman, Oct. 3010-16

    Global Ag: Ebola Hits West Africa Hard – DTN10-16

    Grain Markets: Crop Prices Up After Bearish USDA Report10-16

    Brazil Soybeans: Dry Conditions Put Planting on Hold10-16

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Rail Backlog Grows, Secondary Bids Spike10-16

    U.S. Drought Outlook: Improvements for Southwest, Southern CA10-16

    Coarse Grain Outlook: Record Corn Yields Produce Record Crop10-16

    Rice Outlook: U.S. Production Projection Raised to 220.7M Cwt10-16

    Resistant Weeds: USDA Accelerates the Fight — DTN10-16

    Mississippi Soybeans: Poised to Shatter Record for Average Yield10-16

    Keith Good: Beige Book — Observations on Ag Economy10-16

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney