Monday, April 23, 2012

Iowa: How Much Crop Residue to Remove

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop residue removal — what effect does it have on corn yield and soil quality? That’s a question quite often asked these days.

The adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems help keep significant amounts of crop residue on the soil surface, which can create management challenges, especially in areas with wet and cold soil conditions. Also, more acres of continuous corn are being grown, which leads to a greater amount of crop residue on fields compared to corn-soybean rotation. These higher levels of crop residue bring more challenges for farmers.

 

Increased use of no-till and other conservation systems helps sustain the soil quality and improve environmental quality by reducing soil erosion. However, in the near future corn residue could be removed from fields for cellulosic ethanol production in addition to current animal uses. This trend may encourage the switch to continuous corn, which can lead to high N application and more conventional tillage. The increase in conventional tillage coupled with high use of nitrogen fertilizer in continuous corn will present a significant soil and water quality challenge.

The trend to more continuous corn, more crop residue removal, higher rates of nitrogen applied and potentially more tillage will present economic and environmental challenges that we need to consider.

The use of corn stover for cellulosic ethanol production or any other use should be weighed against the potential impact on soil productivity, environmental consequences and food availability. That’s why researchers are looking at the potential for crops like miscanthus and switchgrass for making cellulosic ethanol. To strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability, alternative perennial biomass sources for cellulosic ethanol production are being explored to combine with corn grain ethanol.


The value of crop residue is obvious.

How much residue to harvest?

The main crop Iowa grows is corn and the crop residue corn produces each year is the most readily available feedstock for making cellulosic ethanol and for animal use. But that residue plays a very important role in sustaining soil quality which must be kept in mind when deciding how much corn stover to harvest and how much to leave on a field.

Leaving crop residue on the soil surface will improve the cycling of nutrients and ultimately soil quality, both of which increase and sustain soil productivity. Corn residue left on the field after harvest is a critical source of soil organic matter; it provides protection for the soil against water and wind erosion; and it contributes to the improvement of soil and water quality.

Alternative uses of corn residue for various purposes, such as baling the residue for livestock use or for cellulosic ethanol production, needs to be approached carefully. Removal of too much crop residue potentially can have adverse effects on soil and water quality.

How much corn residue can be safely removed from a field? Sustainable stover removal rates depend on several factors such as soil erodibility, surface slope, cultural practices and climate conditions. Recent studies suggest that only 20 to 30 percent of the total stover production could be removed for biofuel, based on ground cover requirements to control soil erosion. However, other studies suggest that residue removal should be lower than 20 percent, especially with conventional tillage, in order to maintain soil quality and nutrient cycling for long-term soil productivity.

Consider long-term effects of residue removal

The impact of crop residue removal on soil productivity and environmental quality is not a short-term outcome, particularly in the Midwest, where high organic matter, high soil productivity and good agriculture production conditions mask the short-term effect of residue removal.

Possible short-term impacts of corn stover removal may include an increase in amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and other nutrients that need to be applied to replace these nutrients lost due to crop residue removal. Potential deficiencies of nutrients and decline of organic matter in the soil are both the long-term impacts. It was estimated that nutrients replacement cost due to corn residue removal was approximately $20 per ton of removed corn residue. These nutrients will be permanently lost from the soil system nutrients pool due to lack of replenishment from crop residue and they have to be added to maintain soil productivity.

Keep in mind that when you harvest corn crop residue from a field, a significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed. Using no-till and above agronomic nitrogen fertilizer rate may help in reducing soil organic matter loss in the short-term due to crop residue removal.

Key Points:

• What else do you remove when you harvest corn crop residue from a field?
• A significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed.
• Using no-till and adequate N application rates may minimize soil organic matter loss due to residue removal in the short-term.


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    U.S. Rice: Planting Decisions Stalled; Alternative Crops Considered1-30

    AgFax Cotton Review: Harvest a Mixed Bag for Texas Growers; India Sells Off Stockpiles1-30

    Rice Market World: Prices Low – But More Positives Than Negatvies1-30

    AgFax Grain Review: Neonics Use Critical; Soybean Prices to Drop, Corn May Rally1-30

    Peanuts: Bankrupt Texoma Sells Mississippi Buy, Dry Facility1-30

    Florida Peanuts: Done Right, Rotation Adds Thousands Of Pounds1-30

    Grain TV: Soybean Year-to-Date Exports Lower than 20141-30

    Cleveland on Cotton: World Consumption Increases; Will U.S. Sell Out?1-30

    Rose on Cotton: Demand is Hot; Anticipate a Pre-Plant Rally1-30

    Biofuel Industry Threatened with Shutdown – DTN1-30

    DTN Livestock Close: Positive Day for Cattle1-30

    Welch on Wheat: Texas Conditions Decline, Still Above Average1-30

    Doane Cotton Close: Strong Exports Don’t Provide Strong Support1-30

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: General Weakness Continues1-30

    AFB Cotton Close: Narrow Trade Ends Lower1-30

    AFB Rice Close: Hard Sell Off1-30

    Harvard Farm Boy to Show Fellow Students Real Farmers – DTN1-30

    Welch on Grain: Corn, Sorghum Continue to See Strong Exports1-30

    DTN Cotton Close: Tight Trade Ends at Midrange1-30

    2015 Is International Year of the Soils – Video1-30

    Catfish Production Acres Declined 10%1-30

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights1-30

    DTN Grain Close: Late Corn Rally1-30

    Weekly Cotton Market Review1-30

    DTN Livestock Midday: Cattle Futures Bounce Higher1-30

    DTN Grain Midday: Corn, Soybeans Lead Drop1-30

    Farm Management: 3 Reasons to Praise A Job Well Done – DTN1-30

    Farming: Leaner Profits Drive Farm Loans – Not Equipment Purchases1-30

    Ethanol Remains Competitive as Gasoline Blend Despite Price1-30

    DTN Cotton Open: Futures Start off Lower1-30

    DTN Livestock Open: Aggressive Pressure to Continue1-30

    Bt Corn Hybrid Manufacturers May Face New EPA Rules1-30

    DTN Grain Open: Trade Begins Quietly Higher1-30

    Georgia Cotton: Glyphosate-Resistant Pigweed Fight Requires Vigilance1-30

    Keith Good: $4.8 Billion Hit to Farm Program Possible Over 10 Years1-30

    Mississippi River Locks – ‘Held Together with Baling Wire and Duct Tape’ – DTN1-29

    Senate Passes Keystone Bill, Unable to Get Supermajority – DTN1-29

    ELS Cotton Competitive Payment Rate Is Zero1-29

    California: New Robotic Weeder to Save Time, Money1-29

    Peanut Stocks: Utilization Up 6% from Last Year1-29

    U.S. Grain Transportation: Corn Inspections Highest Since October1-29

    North Carolina: Cotton Variety Performance Data Available1-29

    Texas Pecans: Trade Slow as Harvest Winds Down1-29

    Western Region Pecans: Light Deliveries, Harvest Nearly Done1-29

    U.S. Energy: Market Balances Seen in Changing Futures Price Spreads1-29

    Gasoline Prices: Average Declines Again1-29

    Propane Stocks: Down 1.9M Barrels1-29

    Diesel Prices: Average Drops 7 Cents1-29

    North Carolina: Feb. 4 Meeting Looks At Crop Mix, Marketing Decisions For 20151-28

    Biodiesel: Policy Incentives Necessary for Profitability1-28

    AgFax Peanut Review: Peanut Protein Cure for Nut Allergy?1-28

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Fewer Pre-Purchases Than Normal1-28

    Ag Lenders’ Sentiment – Latest National Survey From K-State – (Audio)1-28

    Drones – The Next Big Tool in Agriculture1-28

    AgFax Rice Review: Govt. Action Requested Over Iraq Trade; Japan May Increase U.S. Imports1-28

    Seramas: Little Chickens With Great Personality1-28

    Ag Fuel Costs Likely to Dip, Chemicals to Rise in 2015 — DTN1-28

    Seed Companies Expected to Hold Line on Price Increases — DTN1-28

    Soybeans: Higher Protein Levels Mean Better Quality, Better Prices – DTN1-27

    Crop Insurance: Most Corn Farmers Opting for PLC – DTN1-27

    Soybean Rust Turns Up In Louisiana On Kudzu1-27

    Florida: AgSave Summit Meetings, Feb. 231-27

    Crop Insurance: Difference in Expected Program Payments1-27

    Wild Hogs: North Carolina Hunter Scores Record Kill1-27

    Soybeans: East Coast Winter Weather Is No Match for Biodiesel1-27

    Cotton: Industry Recognizes Utah Researcher For Cotton Genome Efforts1-27

    Corn and Soybean Market: Consumption is the Story1-27

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney