Monday, April 23, 2012

Iowa: How Much Crop Residue to Remove

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


Crop residue removal — what effect does it have on corn yield and soil quality? That’s a question quite often asked these days.

The adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems help keep significant amounts of crop residue on the soil surface, which can create management challenges, especially in areas with wet and cold soil conditions. Also, more acres of continuous corn are being grown, which leads to a greater amount of crop residue on fields compared to corn-soybean rotation. These higher levels of crop residue bring more challenges for farmers.

Increased use of no-till and other conservation systems helps sustain the soil quality and improve environmental quality by reducing soil erosion. However, in the near future corn residue could be removed from fields for cellulosic ethanol production in addition to current animal uses. This trend may encourage the switch to continuous corn, which can lead to high N application and more conventional tillage. The increase in conventional tillage coupled with high use of nitrogen fertilizer in continuous corn will present a significant soil and water quality challenge.

The trend to more continuous corn, more crop residue removal, higher rates of nitrogen applied and potentially more tillage will present economic and environmental challenges that we need to consider.

The use of corn stover for cellulosic ethanol production or any other use should be weighed against the potential impact on soil productivity, environmental consequences and food availability. That’s why researchers are looking at the potential for crops like miscanthus and switchgrass for making cellulosic ethanol. To strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability, alternative perennial biomass sources for cellulosic ethanol production are being explored to combine with corn grain ethanol.


The value of crop residue is obvious.

How much residue to harvest?

The main crop Iowa grows is corn and the crop residue corn produces each year is the most readily available feedstock for making cellulosic ethanol and for animal use. But that residue plays a very important role in sustaining soil quality which must be kept in mind when deciding how much corn stover to harvest and how much to leave on a field.

Leaving crop residue on the soil surface will improve the cycling of nutrients and ultimately soil quality, both of which increase and sustain soil productivity. Corn residue left on the field after harvest is a critical source of soil organic matter; it provides protection for the soil against water and wind erosion; and it contributes to the improvement of soil and water quality.

Alternative uses of corn residue for various purposes, such as baling the residue for livestock use or for cellulosic ethanol production, needs to be approached carefully. Removal of too much crop residue potentially can have adverse effects on soil and water quality.

How much corn residue can be safely removed from a field? Sustainable stover removal rates depend on several factors such as soil erodibility, surface slope, cultural practices and climate conditions. Recent studies suggest that only 20 to 30 percent of the total stover production could be removed for biofuel, based on ground cover requirements to control soil erosion. However, other studies suggest that residue removal should be lower than 20 percent, especially with conventional tillage, in order to maintain soil quality and nutrient cycling for long-term soil productivity.

Consider long-term effects of residue removal

The impact of crop residue removal on soil productivity and environmental quality is not a short-term outcome, particularly in the Midwest, where high organic matter, high soil productivity and good agriculture production conditions mask the short-term effect of residue removal.

Possible short-term impacts of corn stover removal may include an increase in amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and other nutrients that need to be applied to replace these nutrients lost due to crop residue removal. Potential deficiencies of nutrients and decline of organic matter in the soil are both the long-term impacts. It was estimated that nutrients replacement cost due to corn residue removal was approximately $20 per ton of removed corn residue. These nutrients will be permanently lost from the soil system nutrients pool due to lack of replenishment from crop residue and they have to be added to maintain soil productivity.

Keep in mind that when you harvest corn crop residue from a field, a significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed. Using no-till and above agronomic nitrogen fertilizer rate may help in reducing soil organic matter loss in the short-term due to crop residue removal.

Key Points:

• What else do you remove when you harvest corn crop residue from a field?
• A significant amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium is removed.
• Using no-till and adequate N application rates may minimize soil organic matter loss due to residue removal in the short-term.


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    AgFax Cotton Review: Variety Is Key to Profitability; Australia Suffers from Major Storm3-27

    Rose on Cotton: Don’t Miss an Opportunity. Get Short Terms in Place.3-27

    Grain TV: Soybean Basis Improves3-27

    Video: 8 Need-to-know Things About Southern Grain3-27

    Cover Crops: What’s the Cost? Online Tool Helps Figure it Out.3-27

    DTN Livestock Close: Hogs Cautious Ahead of Reports3-27

    ARC-PLC Deadline Extension: 77% of Farmers Have Made a Decision – DTN3-27

    Soybeans: What Inputs Can You Cut Back? 5 Main Choices. – DTN3-27

    Cleveland On Cotton: “December has 70 cents plus written all over it.”3-27

    Texas: Feral Hog, Predator Management Workshop, Rocksprings, April 243-27

    Weekly Cotton Market Review – USDA3-27

    DTN Cotton Close: Light Volume with Outside Support3-27

    DTN Grain Close: Market Concerns Over Tuesday’s Reports3-27

    Video: 13 Best Practices to Manage Tarnished Plant Bugs3-27

    Peanut Stocks: Utilization Up 7% Over Last Year3-27

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights3-27

    Soybeans: How Has Chinese Demand Impacted the Market? – farmdoc3-27

    Oklahoma City Farm Show, April 3-53-27

    Texas: Hale and Swisher Crops Conference, Plainview, April 143-27

    Louisiana: Soybean Board Awards LSU $1.9M for Soy Research3-27

    DTN Livestock Midday: Cattle Complex Gains Strength3-27

    DTN Grain Midday: Market Indices Higher3-27

    Base Acres and ARC-PLC Deadline Extended to April 7 – No Surprise Here.3-27

    Mississippi: Students Learn Soil Management, Conservation by Getting Down in the Dirt3-27

    Estate Planning: Farmers Gift the Farm to Their Rural Community – DTN3-27

    Southern Corn: Wide Delays Continue, How Late Can You Go? – AgFax3-27

    Corn Maybe Has More Bullish Potential Than Beans Ahead Of USDA Projections3-27

    DTN Cotton Open: Little Change on Thin Volume3-27

    Georgia: Wheat Leaf Rust Detected, May Want to Check the Field3-27

    Crop Subsidies Deadline: Confusing Info, 25% Farmers Still Not Sure What to Do – Keith Good3-27

    Texas A&M: Run USDA On-Line Decision Tool Again. Say What? – Keith Good3-27

    DTN Livestock Open: Limited Feedlot Offerings3-27

    DTN Grain Open: Pressure By Rally in the U.S. Dollar Index3-27

    Death Tax: South Dakota Congressman Pushes Repeal, Tells Her Story – Video3-26

    Environmental Group Questions USDA’s Science Integrity – DTN3-26

    Making Money With Manure, Advantages of Composting and Additives – DTN3-26

    Chumrau on Wheat: Where More Rain is Needed to Make the HRW Crop3-26

    Texas Wheat: Concho, McCulloch Counties Wheat Tour, Millersview, April 303-26

    Sorghum: Why It’s South China’s Hottest Import Grain – DTN3-26

    ELS Cotton Competitive Payment Rate Is Zero3-26

    Moving Grain: Ohio River Barge Traffic Improves3-26

    Video: Summary of U.S. Drought Monitor in One Minute3-26

    Drought Monitor: Warm, Dry Weather Further Depletes Snowpacks3-26

    Wheat Yields: What to Expect? A Historical Perspective – farmdoc3-26

    Oklahoma: Ag Pesticide Disposal, Purcell, April 223-26

    Residential Propane, Heating Oil: Prices Decrease3-26

    Diesel: Prices Decrease3-26

    Gasoline: Prices Up Slightly3-26

    U.S. Energy: Gasoline Specifications Change and So Does the Price3-26

    Midwest Soybean Plantings Up If Weather Delays Continue – DTN3-26

    New Swine Census Expected to be Full of “Oopsies” – DTN3-26

    Grain TV: Increased Ethanol Production3-25

    AgFax Grain Review: Manage for Higher Soy Yields; Less Corn to Switch to Soybeans3-25

    Michigan: 31 Counties Designated Natural Disaster Areas3-25

    Oklahoma: Payne County Designated Natural Disaster Area3-25

    Marketing: Are You Really Getting the Best Price for Your Crop? – farmdoc3-25

    Spray Drift: Checking Wind Speed Isn’t Enough – DTN3-25

    Irrigation – Moisture Sensors Pay Dividends, Says This Consultant (Podcast)3-25

    Illinois Soybean Farmers Asked to Complete Online Survey3-25

    Grain TV: Improved Crop Conditions in Southern Plains3-24

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Dollar Support Gives Way3-24

    AFB Cotton Close: Dec. Holds Above 643-24

    AFB Rice Close: Unable to Hold Daily Highs3-24

    Welch on Wheat: Crop Conditions Continue to Improve3-24

    California Tree Crops: 12 Quick Things To Know This Week (Video)3-24

    Welch on Grain: Fewer Corn Acres, More Soybeans Expected in USDA Reports3-24

    Peanuts: Southern Growers Conference Set For July 23-253-24

    Farm Bill: USDA Seeks to Limit Payments to Non-Farmers3-24

    Planting: 11 Maintenance Steps for Your Planter3-24

    Crop Production Forecast: Needing a Clearer Crystal Ball – USDA Blog3-24

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices3-24

    Non-Family Farm Managers: Proof Required for Program Payments, 2016 – DTN3-24

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: Price Stability Could Be an Illusion3-24

    Avian Flu Prevention is the Best Form of Poultry Protection – DTN3-24

    Farm Programs: Expected Payment Estimates for Last Minute Decisions – farmdoc3-24

    Rice: Nitrogen-Efficient Varieties Demonstrate Significant Yield Increases3-24

    Farmers Gained New Markets In The ’20s, Thanks To Clarence3-24

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney +