Thursday, April 19, 2012

Georgia Peanuts: Inoculation Tips For 2012 After Last Year’s Long, Hot Summer

AgFax.Com - Your Online Ag News Source


It’s warmer than normal. It’s dryer than normal. We’re coming off one of the hottest and driest years on record.

R. Scott Tubbs

Sounds like a good time for a refresher about peanut inoculant application.

Because of the conditions mentioned above, the rate of survivability of native Rhizobia present in the soil is likely to be much lower than in most years (regardless of how many years it has been since the last time peanut or a cross-inoculating species was grown in a field).

SoI would highly recom­mend growers strongly consider investing without in a peanut inoculant at-planting this year, especial­ly in non-irrigated fields where prolonged hot and dry soil conditions last year undoubtedly killed a large percentage of the bacteria. It has been stated before by my predecessors and colleagues, and by me in previous years as well – an inoculant application is one of the most cost-effective “insurance policies” at a grower’s disposal.

Without taking the time to run the dollar values at current prices, I can still safely say that in most years it takes merely a 50-80 lb/ac increase in yield to cover the cost of the inoculant application at planting.




You will not see benefits from inoculants each and every year, but considering it only takes a 250 lb/ac yield bump once every 3-5 years to break even on an annual product application, such a de­cision should be an easy one for most growers to make since the chances of a profitable outcome in the long-term is much greater than not.

Some additional reminders regarding formulation decisions:

  • When applied at labeled recommendations, the amount of viable cells delivered on a per acre basis does vary by formulation, with the liquid inoculants supplying the most (8.3 x 1011 cells/ ac), followed by sterile peat products (5.8 x 1011 cells/ac), and granular supplying the least (2.4 x 1011 cells/ac). However, this should not be the primary deciding factor on which formulation to select.
  • Sterile peat/powder formulations are only recommended if there is no way of applying the other formulations. To get good coverage/sticking of the product to the seed, the seed need to be mois tened. This requires drying time to prevent messy planter problems. When applied dry, there will be inadequate seed coverage. I have data showing reduced nodulation and yields using this for mulation compared to the other formulations.
  • Do not confuse the granular inoculant formulation with the sterile peat/powder formulation, they are not the same. The granular formulation, while also a dry product, is not applied to the seed prior to planting, it is metered through a dry metering box such as an insecticide/herbicide hopper and placed in-furrow.
  • Regardless of formulation, these are living organisms. If you want them to remain alive/viable, then don’t leave them sitting in the cab of a hot pickup truck or tractor, nor exposed to direct sunlight.
  • Likewise, since this is a living medium, exposure to certain pesticides designed to kill living or ganisms (insecticides, fungicides, etc.) may adversely affect the product. Minimize exposure to such products, and consult the labels/websites/representatives for more information about mix ing of products. There should be minimal concerns of exposure to typical peanut seed treat ments, and short-term exposure to common in-furrow fungicides in the case of tank-mixes. But a chlorine-free water source must be used as the carrier for liquid inoculants.
  • When soil conditions are relatively dry, liquid inoculants will disperse away from the intended target, thus the concentration of Rhizobia near the seedling upon emergence and early season growth when infection should be occurring may be hindered. The granular formulation will re main at the bottom of the seed furrow, where intended. Therefore, in non-irrigated conditions with only marginal soil moisture, granular products should be considered.

Tags: ,


Leave a Reply

Name and Email Address are required fields. Your email will not be published or shared with third parties.

Sunbelt Ag News

    Grain TV: Positive Day but No Major Gains10-1

    DTN Livestock Close: Cattle Futures See Bullish Explosion10-1

    U.S. Dollar Strength Weighing Down Commodity Markets – DTN10-1

    DTN Cotton Close: Settles to Marginal Losses10-1

    DTN Grain Close: Slight Price Rebound10-1

    DTN Livestock Midday: Strong Gains Develop Across Complex10-1

    U.S. Ag Shortliners Take Their Technology to World — DTN10-1

    DTN Grain Midday: Futures Lower in Quiet Trade10-1

    DTN Fertilizer Trends: State Averages for Anhydrous Vary Widely10-1

    Good on Grain: Stocks Estimates Provide No Support for Prices10-1

    Arkansas: Winter Wheat Growers Set Another Yield Record10-1

    Georgia Peanut Commission Launches Peanut Allergy Website10-1

    DTN Cotton Open: Edges Higher within Tight Ranges10-1

    Shifts in Corn Consumption Revealed in USDA Report — DTN10-1

    DTN Livestock Open: Futures Set for Mixed Start10-1

    USDA Grain Stocks Report Bearish for Corn, Wheat — DTN10-1

    DTN Grain Open: Lower Start Across Board10-1

    Keith Good: U.S., Brazil Reportedly Agree to Settle Cotton Dispute10-1

    Farm Bill Decision Deadlines and the Farm Bill Toolbox9-30

    Doane Cotton Close: Analyst Predicts 40 Cent Futures9-30

    AFB Grain-Soybean Close: Prices Lower Despite Bullish Soy Stocks9-30

    AFB Cotton Close: Futures in the Red9-30

    AFB Rice Close: Futures Fractionally Mixed9-30

    AgFax Cotton Review: Global Supply Hurts Prices; Cotton Transition Assistance Program Deadline Looms9-30

    USDA: Weekly National Peanut Prices9-30

    USDA Grain Stocks: Corn Up 50%, Wheat 2; Soybeans Drop 359-30

    USDA Wheat: Production Drops 5 Percent from 20139-30

    Grain Storage, Transportation Worries Mount — DTN9-29

    Soybeans: Protein, Oil Values Rate More Market Attention — DTN9-29

    Soybean Harvest Rises by 7 Points, Corn 5 — DTN9-29

    Growing Demand for Pork Likely to be Met — and Quickly9-29

    Peanut Stocks and Processing: Utilization Up 4%, Stocks at 1.4B Pounds9-29

    Peanuts: New Revenue Policy Implemented by USDA9-29

    Flint on Crops: What is a Good Variety Worth?9-29

    Southern Grain Crops In 2014 – Top 10 Trends, Issues, Setbacks – AgFax9-28

    Farm to Table: Something Old is New Again. – AgFax9-26

    Rice: Mexico To Restore Import Tariffs on Asian Rice9-26

    Rice Crop: Delta Area Harvests Picking Up Steam9-26

    Rice Market: Strong Friday Push Makes for a Positive Week9-26

    Rose on Cotton: Bearish News – We got plenty.9-26

    Cleveland on Cotton: Chinese Moves Send Market into Free Fall9-26

    Sizing Up Sudden Death Syndrome: Management Decisions to Fight Back – DTN9-26

    Nebraska: New Study Addresses Climate Change Challenges – DTN9-26

    GMO Wheat Appears in Montana as USDA Wraps Up Oregon Investigation – DTN9-26

    Welch on Wheat: Harvest Behind Normal, Conditions Decline9-26

    Louisiana: Ag Officials Ask for New Rules for Drones9-26

    Welch on Grain: Corn Condition Improves Slightly9-26

    USDA: Peanut Price Highlights9-26

    Shurley on Cotton: Carefully Consider Selling Options9-26

    AgFax Wildlife Review: S.C. National Park Confronts Wild Hog Problem9-26

    Crop Insurance Details Clearing Up — DTN9-26

    Sunbelt Ag Events

     

    About Us

    AgFax.Com covers agricultural trends and production topics, with an emphasis on news about cotton, rice, peanuts, corn, soybeans, wheat and tree crops, including almonds, pecans, walnuts and pistachios.

      

    This site also serves as the on-line presence of electronic crop and pest reports published by AgFax Media LLC (formerly Looking South Communications).

        

    Click here to subscribe to our free reports.

      

    We provide early warnings and confirmations about pests, diseases and other factors that influence yield. Our goal is to quickly provide farmers and crop advisors with information needed to make better and more profitable decisions.

         

    Our free weekly crop and pest advisories include:

    • AgFax Midsouth Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri.

    • AgFax Southeast Cotton, covering cotton production and news in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southwest Cotton (new for 2013!), covering cotton production and news in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.

    • AgFax West (formerly MiteFax: SJV Cotton), covering California cotton, alfalfa, tomatoes and other non-permanent crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgFax Rice covering rice production and news in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas.

    • AgFax Peanuts, covering peanut production in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

    • AgFax Southern Grain: covering soybeans, corn, milo and small grains in Southern states.

    • AgFax Almonds, covering almonds, pistachios, walnuts and other tree crops in California's Central Valley.

    • AgCom 101, providing guidance to ag professionals involved in social media.

    Our newsletters are sponsored by the following companies: FMC Corporation Chemtura Dow AgroSciences.

          

    Mission statement:

    Make it as easy as possible for our community of readers to find and/or receive needed information.

              

    Contact Information:

    AgFax Media. LLC

    142 Westlake Drive Brandon, MS 39047

    601-992-9488 Office 601-992-3503 Fax

    Owen Taylor Debra L. Ferguson Laurie Courtney

          

    Circulation Questions?

    Contact Laurie Courtney